History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-711
Tex. Att'y Gen.
Jul 2, 1939
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 OFFICE OF THE Al-l-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

op3nion loo. O-711 op3nion loo. O-711 R8r Ttre C?iftWt Of R8r Ttre C?iftWt Of *2 Hen. W. Lee O*Daniel, June 10, 1999, Page 2

intention have btwm filed with the proper au- thorities, and that suoh per005 ,&all be a bcna fide resident Or tha state of Texas far at least SIX (6) months Immediately prior to the inakin& or appllaatim to the Habdreesing and/or Cosmetolog;y Department for pcmaieeion to take such exsmlnstfon to entttle such per- 8011 to so pm&Ice 3alrdressing and/or aosmet- ology orany of Its branahes in this State."

Seoticn 1 of muss Bill lS9 (Artlole os.Uj q the present tlw rea4B M fulluw~ saltoengagehtha

efahdrdrea8aror *3 .Horl. :;. Lee OlDaniel, June 10, X39, Page 3

Se have not been asked to pass upon the validf- ty of the prcvisim of substitute S.B. 100, whioh rrould require a hair&essar or oosmetolO&st to be a oiti%en of the United Statea of America, but we feel that it is our duty to point out that mid provlslon Is a olear vlo- l&ion of the 14th Aslendment to the Oonstltuticn of the United States, which dealares that no state shall deprive any person al' life, liberty or proparty without dus pro- cess of law, nor deny to any person within its jurlsdio- tion the equal proteotim of the laws.

HOD.. &. Lee o*Daniel., June 10, 1999, Page 4 the case of Tezplar v, Se cite as authority Ei:ichi~an State Board of miners of Barbers (Supresm Court of NiChi@iIl) 131 tioh. 254, 90 I?% 10058. In that case it wa8 held that Act No. 2l2 Pub. Acts 1899, B 5, lkichigan, providing for the exsml&on and licensing oi' barbers, and stipulating that 50 pewon eb~ll reoeive a oertitioate, who at the tirm ot hia (IL- aminatim la an alien, is repugnant to the 14th Amendment of the IJuited Stutes Constitution, as denying equal pro- tection of the law, lu so far as it discriminates gl aa- oouut of oitizenship.

Eon. IT. Lee O'lhniczl, June 10, 1939, Pa@ 5

requisite knowledge upon the subjeote preacrlb- ed by the Lag%alaturc to praotloe his oolling without endangering the health of his patrons. To hold that he Is not entitled to praotioe this calling, beoauae not a full citizen of the United States, is to deny to him rights whioh we think are preserved by the fourteenth amendmnt.W

a* holdthat theprotislon42r mastitutss.t). mototkeerr66tal8talyp6r6oa6ag6glaginfheprae- tl6e %.r 066upistior ur 8 -sar ur uommtu&gl6t or 06nda6tioe: a Bsirdrelultlg or uuem&ulogUul eatabw- Allt *almll b6 a eit;Mlr ur th8 ualt6d stat66 6r Amml6u clp pzwhati prooi to th6 prepor A&lnl&r8t1ve r4ntharit~ w&t& the prupar autkfmitlefl ti UWast

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1939
Docket Number: O-711
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.