Case Information
*1 OFFICE OFTHLATTORNMQRNERALOFTEXAS AUSTIN . .
.3 t a 3. h..’ latter schi~ols Lsve not been an2rovsd or accrsdltsd by th5.s Eosrd either OS to qusl- ificrtions of stuCent nurses or as to o(j;Llrses 0r tit;itiy by Dtudants or any other mstter? '3. %b'ould tkia Boord be autborlzed to issue s si~CFa1 llcanse t0 ~;~pliOf.UltS iOr nursi:y in tub~rciilar on~ee~o~ly, where tho q&.lciinta hsve ritte3ded a nurskg soLoo oonneoted with a hoapltal ~aoeptiag aa pa- tierit8 only thooe rirtllated uith tub6reulo- sl8 u&ther'thea.urdgaohoel~coo* 1t&6.8psalalnur9~Mhoeloroot, u&k tha applSauit8 ham not attended for Qa.0 oaatllluous yB@w ml MaredIted Lture *3 L -
Hon. OrTIll s. krpbutor, Fa6b 3 the power to make any rule0 and ra&u.latIona with Comds8ion
referenae to 80a8ona1w0rkemf, tho bMetlt8 for suoh worker8 or the oontrlbutlons o? their amployezn.
The oaptlon of Sanata Bill Ho. 21 dobo not In any rtate that a nw Seot:on, tc-wit! Seatlon 8-A Is being to tha bill or tha original Aat; It does, howover, speaIfIaally note that two new aeatlons. Seotlon 19-A and Seotlan 19-B are being added.
-e aall your attention to 39 Tex. Sur. p. 104 in whloh we ilnd the follmIng statement:
"And where a title names aa the p&poee of.tho Aot the amendmant of spealfled motion of a former bill, the body o? the sot, after amndlng suah 8bo- tlon, may not prcmeml to ret out other 8eotlons whlah would beaome a part of the origIna aat but Omlah are not Inoludad In the title by reason of be- ohangos in, Or Ql8Z~Qt.S Of, the 8sOtiOII 8peOifibd thQ'dJL"
Thle other rtetement is found in Tar. Jur. p. 104: “The title a pUl’906b upre8sIng to amand a 8-t uta In a oortafn particular la dsaeptlve aud mirhaA- lng ln8ofar a8 the Iply of the aat purport8 to aawl a prior law in other partIoular8.a In 8bMte Bill HO. 21 (SbOtiOn 8-A. $Ub8bOtiOL! (3). Artlals 522lb) the Lagirlaturb antl addbd IMU hu orbatbd fUWtbA -With for tflb &1mi~81m~8, pbXMittbI6 thbm to do O- t0 8bMOIlb.l UOrk@F8 8lldthbir UglgbZY8, rOf8r@ElOb a par not haretotore dolbgated to the Comd88ioa. Ho Mn- tlon I8 Mda in uptlon of tha Bill putting thb mmbbn of the pub110 upOn IlotiOb that of the LOgiE~tUl?b till& IIW sti the Laglslatura as an ambndm~t to mtter wa8 belaa the already exlrt tbmrploymnt Catxpen8ation Aat. ‘Phb aap- tlon la misleading and does not inrona the 8euubb?8 of thb LegIelature of the subjeot matter upon whlah thay are mting.
Thb 8pnoffloation oi the nature of the prOpO8ed aaendmat In our opinion rlxes the oharaoter of the amndmcat as on8 sseklng no other alteratloli In the OrIgInal l rtlole than to do the thin@ named. They speaItlaally aat out that new Seotlons 19-r\ and nere being added. The listing o? thb Seotlons of ArtIole 5221-b to be aaended, tha 8pbOifiOIlthIl *4 Hon. Crvllle S. Carpenter, Pagb 4
of the nature of the proposbd amndaont8 and the info~atlon that new Saotions 19-A aud wbra baIng added was a dIs- tlnot aismranoe that the objeot or the act wa8 llmlted one.
The announasment having been made Legislature, In the caption, that Artlole 5221-b kltle to be mended In oertain Fmtlauleirs, no different or nw embndments oan be added, 800 'Zard Cattle and Tasturs Company YE. Carpenter, 200 S. 'fi. 521, and Aruold vs. Leonard, 273 S. 7:. 800. To pernit ruoh a pro- oedure Is, In our oplnlon, a violation of krtlale 3, Seotlon ot the Constitution of Texar,.
It la our opinion that the aaptlon of Senate Bill Ho. 21 Is not broad enough to aoter the new matter lnaluded in Seotlon 8-n, Submotion (3), a8 provlded In the amendmmxt to Ax-8101~ 5221-b. Ia riew of our 8nwbr to your tint que8- tlon, wo do not believe it nbobs8ax-y to awsrer your rrooond qaeatIolL
ccc