Case Information
*1 ‘oiwc~~ OF’THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN B”O”rn” ILLLL”.
Arr0111.” 0.rw”lL ttllr 1,,1*ss . . e 0, ma iraID tb
offonr;* you hare tr or riosnlty or xoum- l lr oum8tonoes O? th e nt the tolloriry~~uor~ Wo hno boon unmblo 8o tind •~ l thorlty with rr- an l xoeption to form00 to state pzoporty a8 would l nrtituta the role th6t 0 p8r8on rhall k proreeuted in the oounty rhero thr lolloming l rtiolor 0r the Cob. thr offoncle w.8 ooadttod. of Grl~4nrl Rrooodure rpperr to oontrol the tonne ei the otiuua a8 stated above without dlstiaetion udo ktrrrn rtak pnt- pertp mid that $olon&g to 8ny I.ndirldorll
"Art. 190. on the boandar~ of two l ount%o~.
a:. _~
~83 0rm8e l 0dttea 01 1 th e b0wr ry o r b r p, tr0 or within Sour hundred yordo thereof, ray oountles, in l lther oounty.* be promouted and punlrhul *Art. LOO. R*oolVlng on6 eonollolin~ l toloa
propsrtx. ReOolrhIg 8nd OOAOOO~ing otolen gropr- in the bounty when the thofi ty arsy be proseouted or in any other XGO oonlttod, through or county into rhlob the property MJ hare beo;;;;m:yby the perron l too)lng the ooao, or:
wharo the mame uy have km. reoa’ wed or oonoralo4 f” .
by the oifwlore*
In +lon of th e obore l utb o rltlo o, 7mi ore reopoot- ir thr opinion 0r thio dbpwtmant thet tu11y w.lvl8*4 that it l oompldnt oher&iag one rltb reoelrlaa 8tolm property belong- in the l ounty oooord- lq to the #tote, would hare to br film4 lq to the proviolono or Art1010 BOO, 0040 of Or*01 -Fro- oeauro, 1985. Trrrrlo dounty would hero no Jur$rdlotla, of l uoh on 0trw00 ulllo r r th e l teto’o Qr o pwty wau l tolon in, or wno oarried through or rooelvd or oonoerled by the offender in oald oounty.
TrustioE the l bwo 8navm-a your guestion, we roPaln YOurB tsq truly APfROVSD JULY 10, 1939
o/ w. Y. xooro -3 ASSIsTAMT ATN@iEX O$l@H&