Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE QENERAL OF TEXAS AlTORNEY
AUSTIN
lioaorablr Strpirn F. Eabrrt, paeo 2
or thr l dmlnlstratlra alrtrlet, in @~rnU *urn thr Is l bsrnt or 1~ fro8 an7 oausa mauler jod#r thuaof rm24 pre.aldln(l, and in ln- 4l~ablo4 or 4laquallfla4 at~~.~ara wham tha ramlor dlatrict judge lr praaant or hlaar~i trying comae whom l uthorlrrd or poxmlttad by thr Conatltutlon or lara of the State.
Artlcls 1687, Ro~iaad Civil 8tatuta8, 1925, eoart praaant prrslta tha praotlolaa ~a~rra of to aloot froa amx@ their auabar a apaelal job(a, rho ahall hold owrt and prooud with tha b~alnras la lartanorr Barr the jUdea of a 4iatrlot thweof, court on thr rirat or rnf futoro dsf or 0 tar8 falla or rafusaa hold ooort. Artiolr 1893, Ra~lmd Cltll Statutes, 1925, adda “nbaeaoV’ to tie sltuetlona lawyers of the oourt may l laot whurln the praotlelng & l poola1 judge.
Tour question 18 8naruad by thr following qoatatlon from thr aasa of Glorrr ta. Albraoht, 17) s. I. 504, whueln Chid Justloa ALasant atatrdr
*Tha Conatltutlon prorldrr that l raosno~ in tha oifl~r of judaa ahall be flllad by l ppointamt and oalr 8uthorisu thr l p p olsta~t of by the Oovarnor, l rpeslal jadgr whea the ramlrr Jo4 0 la *abunt*, *dlamblad*, or Wrqual - f ‘ Eo 40 not think l 4 of thr abotr ilrd.
trrms shout4 br eosatru.4 to smbrssr s r~oenr~ owsrd by thr Qutk ot thr mm- J lar jud(s, sad thr Le#lsl8tars hss not l utbDrlae4 tha appointmart of l 8~~1~1 jaQr In suoh osu..
You am thudorr rdrl8ed that no prorl8loa for t&a l lootlon ot a spoof~l Ja460 or has beaa r&a tbr l a~p r r rt or l ja46r frsn l wthrr 4lstrlot dthln tha abrlnlstntlrr blatriot, follows tha 408th of tha *3 f
Hcnorabla Staphan F. Hebart, papa 3 judgr, thr fllllng or the raornoy
regular and prior oocaalonod by death of tha dlatrlot judge by appolat- arnt naao by the Oorarnor.
Your8 vary truly A’l?‘lXRRRY GRR'ERAL OI l'?ZAS B7 Riobar& 1. Iralrohll4 Aaalatant ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TZAS