History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-2213
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1940
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 Hon. H. A. Glass, Director

Textbook Division

~Department of Education

Austin, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-2213 Re:’ Appropriation Act, S. B. 427, 46th Legislature --Textbook Division-- Employment of necessary additional help .out of contingent fund.

‘This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of date April 12, 1940, wherein you ask the opinion of this department upon the following question: “May the Textbook Division employ necessary addi- tional help and charge it against the contingent expense as itemized under ‘Maintenance and Miscellaneous~’ in Senate Bill No. 427, which is the General Appropriation Bill passed by the last Legislature 7”

It seems, from the statement~of facts ‘which accompanies your ques- tion, that you desire to use the contingent fund to employ additional seasonal help.

There is an item of $6,000 specifically appropriated by the Legisla- ture for “seasonal help, clerical, stenographic and labor.” The contingent fund, by definition, is available only for those items of expense which the Legis- lature has not specifically provided a definitely limited amount to take care of. However, we find in the general rider appended to Senate Bill 427 a provision which indicates a legislative intent that, in addition to the purposes for which the contingent fund is ordinarily to be considered as available, such contingent fund may be used to pay the salaries of additional employees.

The provision of the general rider to which we refer is as follows: “When any additional employees, other than those for which specific salary appropriations have herein been made, are employed and are to be paid out of contingent appropria- tions, such employee~s shall not be paid a larger a~mount than .than provided in the regular appropriated salaries for similar positions in such department or agency, . . .” *2 Hon. H. A. Glass, Page 2, O-2213

This provision of the appropriation bill would be meaningless, if it were not intended by the Legislature that contingent appropriations might be used to employ additional employees. Such authority is there- fore clearly implied, The Legislature obviously must have intended that the contingent appropriations made in Senate Bill 427 should be available ‘for the hiring of additional employees.

Your question is therefore answered in the affirmative.

Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS R. W. Fairchild Assistant RWF:PBP

AP ROVEDMAY 6, 1940

&L

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

APPROVED OPINION Chairman

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1940
Docket Number: O-2213
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.