Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
Eonombl8 B. 1. Roberron Attorney
Uouty alkler county
xolmit, TOxa#
your oountp bar the author the 6alary of a ,aaebiao laspcretor.
the Penal Uode irr ~sideratiaa of the above quot.4 motion at fmtt wblcb lr taken, oonrlnoe5 011
tlv~e intent to vwt in the aormaiwi~~r8~ xt is app2rsnt umler SUOh ael3tion that If the mm- aalwlonem* court has rtrst dstsnained, rither by in8psotion that GhWp (PI’ WttlO :ffOOtiO~ OXiStS Within 02' i~lSJWti&2tiOn, their aounty, they are authorized to ma&c) appropriation to employ fnapeetora to aeafst In the eradlcatlcn of suck dlara~o. *2 to br uader the dlreatkm oi T h e ln&pecto re l a hired,arcl the LiYmitook Sanitary 4k%mxllanion of thlr Et&to. It la aur opinion that pour ocwullraa unun” wisrt
ha0 the autharity to pay 8 portion of the ssl*rg or an in- e&motor to dtwotr a portion of hi6 time to scabies inspeaticn work rrlthin your county upon a determination of th% metl th*ref or.
m
/al Lloyd AmiuQtJng
Awi8tant Jqqx6v.d Opinion cewsmittea By B.W.B., Chaixma