Case Information
*2 "2. Inthe ~ntmmh -8 aemf‘umd-
fwl,Wtilthsnon-reeldentomer ofLot6havea coaapleta aeienw, to a suit brought to %nfor%a paywant of taxee 6s~sesea against w&x propertyt
'8. Sf the ~~annetbe le&lyrefuad- Bd, is them iany other legal method by *oh yrs. Perry asty obtain relief from the unfortumate sit- wtionlrhiahahef~hemalflnt'
wauil1xnlniimr the parn@-apheof our Opi.asoaM oorrcsp6~ well your CQlsstitmaI abwo u%t forth.
1. !Rmtaseu paUlby War Fev,uhieh hne gone to the 8tat8, or whiah are h%ld by the 6olleater for the Btate, may not be robataf or repaid to UFO. rperrg. Artiiclo vs.Is, 6%Iation 6, of our constitution deolaree;
"no umay sballb0 arwxlfronltheTPeaa- ury but in pysuane0 of a 8p9olfia approprta- tionImaeby1aw,"
itith roqleut M We idata mrrttur, our opin- ions X08. O-1742 8m¶ O-2051 are in pd.nt mkl a%elusve. me Oounty a hwwor, amy 1fiwfullJr return to m6. Bemy nxmey p&l by her der the mhtafre 5f faat 88t forth by you, and it ie the County's &Uty to moLe 8mh roftma. This is the ordinary rule OS equity applioablo to thb re- w-m-y of poney pa&l udor a w&stake of fact. Claok fr Tap lor Oounty, 3 Will) Civ. Cae. Ct. of App.,See. 202; Barth vs. Jsetor, 3 I Willi cir. Gwb. Ct. uf App.,SBt. 22333 l&&alke vs. firown, l&$6 6. Wr 42Dl ClPrk Y8+ BrerPlef, 270 6e Il. 101)Ot Jwatt Gtate Bank Y'P). Cormimm late1 33fu&, l$T S. W. 747. S%Q also our opalotl Boo. O-2033.
iion. Hobert E. KirkpbtriOk - P6ge 3
*3 333 6. W. 731; Clftm~e.Bradley, 210 Be W. 1060. our Oplnlons Nos. Q-5266 mu% O-1949 are in point an¶ de&a- iv0 ld thzis question.
2. wo #rat% M answer to your question NO. 2 beoz&uso it irk not the duty or pritilega of t&i0 depart- ment to rendor o#aiooa for the baef'it of privets pw- zons only. This question does not oonoerm any duty im- f&tat% t.0 WbOm -0 pOPt3ii by 18U UpOn
IUQ’ ~ff%Or Of thiSI we the duty of eaYiO6. Coploa of departsmmt81 opinionsaboveoited ciro enelosma hm'emith.