History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-2862
Tex. Att'y Gen.
Jul 2, 1940
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 - Honorable W. L. Edwards

County Attorney

Victoria County

Victoria, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion NO.

Re: Election of third drainage commissioner, Drainage District No. Victoria County, Texas

We have recelved~ your letter of recent date requesting our opinion upon the method of determining the third drainage commissioner of Drainage District No. Victoria County, Texas. For factual background of.your request, we quote from your.

letter as follows:

"At the past General Election Commissioners for the above Drainage District were voted on, as provided for by Article R.C.S. There were four in the race. Of these, two received first and second place, and consequently are duly elected. However, the remaining two tied for third place,.

and we hereby request the opinion of your department to the manner in which the thfrd commissioner shall be elected.

"Article 81.19 would seem to provide that in this instance the third Commissioner is to be chosen by the Commissioner"s Court from the two who tied for third place, although this- statute to our mind is somewhat ambiguous. This was not the first election to be held in the District, as it has been in existence for a number of years."

Article 2953, Revised Civil Statutes, provides: "At any election, if there be an equal number of votes given to two or more persons for the same office, except executive offices as provided in the Constitution, and no one elected thereto, the officer to whom the returns are made shall declare such election void as to such office only, and shall immediately order another election to fill such office; and notice shall be given, and such other election shall be held in the same manner as the general election."

Honorable W. L. Edwards, Page 2,

Article 2953, supra, was enacted in 1876, and was in effect in 1918 when the 35th Legislature,, 4th Called Session, enacted Article 8119, Vernon's Civil Statutes, 1925, which reads: "After a district is so established, upon the petition of a majority of the real property taxpayers of the district, praying for the election of three drainage commissioners, the Court shall immediately order an election for safd purpose at the earliest legal time, to be held as other elections here- under. and shall declare the three persons receiving the highest number of votes to be elected. If the third highest vote be tied, the Courr~~~shall elect the third commissioner from those tying for the place. Such commi duly qualified hereunder, shall be the 1ecra.i anu rigntI-uI .ssioners so e'_ected, when _ - ~ . ^ _ drainaTe commissioners for such district within the full @ziT ng and purpose of this law. Such cammiss til the~llext regular election for State and county o.lfice un hen and thereafter be elec,ted every two officers, and shall t (Empk-asis ours) years at such general election." Article 8113, Vernon's Civil statutes, provides in part: I, . . ..A11 such elections shall be conducted in the manner provided by the general election laws, UnhSS otherwise Pro- vid d e . . . . (Emphasis ours] The "elections" referred to in Article 8113, supra, 4s any election held under Chapter 7, Title 128, Vernonss Civil Strtutes, 1925, pertaining to drainage dist~ricts, and which chapter embodies said Article 8119.

In writing this opinion we are, of course, assuming that a majority of the real property taxpayers of the district petitioned for the election of drainage commissioners in the first insthrIce, as required by Article aupra.

The Legislature, 2n enacting the underscored portion of Article supra, enacted same apparently for the express purpose of avoiding the provisions of Article 2953, aupra, by providing for the election by the Commissionerss Court of the third drainage commissioner,, in the event of a tie vote for that place. It matters not whether this was the first election of such commissioners. Said Article does not provide that this same procedure shall not apply to subse- quent elections, and we see no good reason why it should not so apply.

In the absence of the underscored portion of said Articl~e 8119, which specifically provides the procedure to be *3 Honorable W. L. Edwards,, Page 3, O-2862

followed in the election of the third drainage commissioner in the event of a tie vote,, the general election laws (Art. 2953) would apply, but in view of such specific prov%- sion in said Article the election of drainage ,r-ommissioners is undoubtedly controlled by the provisions of said Article, in all matters and things covered by the provisions of sai.3 Article. Scherz vs. Telfer, 74 S.W* (2d) 327.

Therefore, it is our opinion that Article Vernongs Civil Statute, 1925, governs the election of the drainage commis- sioners' Court of Victoria County to elect the third draina,ye commissioner from the two candidates tying for the third place. Trusting that the above satisfactorily disposes of your inquiry, we remain

Very truly yours ATTGRNEY GENZRAL OF TEXAS BY s;/'D Burla Daviss / .

i3. Burie Daviss Assistant APPROVED DEC. 10, 1940

s/ Grover Sellers

FIRST ASSISTANT

ATTORNEY GENZRAL

DBD:AW/cg

APPROVED OPINION COMMITI'EE

By BWB, Chairman

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1940
Docket Number: O-2862
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.