Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
J
E!onoawbls Gm. ii. Sheppard, Pago 2
euhh leasehold mitaecr warn the own of B.966.62. Qr that aaount +A4 aua of X00.00 wao tander*Q into oourt it and wms decreed tkt the plaintiff l hould hwe aerely a pm+ eonrl :uQ,gaent a@faRt the Par% Gil & Gas Goqamy, Ino., for the bslanoe arf 396.62, with interemt at six peroant aRa Baste of cult. It u8m furthor ordered that abi;l amnwtd lisn far taxes ap&mt the tbuwtotora nlrting loas~hold o&ate &mulQ be aab was expromsly remTed, anQ thh Oi0ua oamt thereupon wea in tha jua~mi rosamod and v804ma.
You reqormt ua to odrias JW atethor or not the aax asreamor-ooll*ator of Hueoa Ceunty Bheula noomlso the jua83i49nt ma aooept the papoat of llOO.00 uld iO8u0 0 for ouch armant and ales iuue o6a%ffic#(ru 8ew reoslpt oallin~ tho balaaoe oi tba, tun, ah8r& on her dtiin~uux8 tax roll, ae well am ths ourrea% taxem for 8h4 year 19cO.
It would aerv* no Oorpora h-e for ur to 60 into the aeritm of the cams oonaltded by the abgvo Judgrreat. For, it la the .!ua@wnt of l wurt of ooatpetwc Jurlealatian, in a salt ror taxse th4 partiu wmr+ betore 6ho In wfllmh Chart, She ?&mte reprerea8ad by %t*8 attorney pro*idod far by thm CrvnrtltutIon tit3a 6titUt#. Sls%O$ howover ttm the ror appaal ha6 not OX@‘& urd the QumotiQR iaYdYea In the mult wes 8 debetable one, 10 think lt Rdtlrable ior the ax hmoaaor-Gollsotcw of &wmw Gotratp to reiraln fr@s in rwognltloa of the rsoeipts and osrtifioatu iso~lne Jud$aent tmtll the mme ha8 baesarr fllul. Ii thm Dira r1th.i.a ahlet! en l ppaal say bo gm?eetrll p4mroa dthout suoh being done, in our 0 ialon, the Jadeiiaeat mhoala that be honorad snQ your quelrt ~a rhodld tm anmrmd fn the f
a?flmatlre.
