History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-3549
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1941
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable Buford D, Battle

State nutitw

hm?Aa, Texas

lionorabls Butord D. Rattle, Faga S

*If your answer to ths above question da in the affirmative, th%a your anmu to thla further question would be halpful.

"Sfnoe Vhltehousc Ind%p%ndeht S%hool Cis- triot is a Rural .;ld Achool, would they be corn- gelled to show the r%venue to be received under the term of th% contract with Hur%k% a8 revenue lu their applloatlon for aid?* In order to make your queatlonr, appear mow oloarlr it may be well to set out furthor explanatory raotr obtained from a reading of the sgpl~cation and from verbal uonvuua- if&r& with you and vvith offlclalr of the

. Bo oontract bus bwn ma&o with Eureka Dlatriot upon whlah the raimburr@ment oi L Ton Dollare ($8X0.00) i8 sought. Tlw t%rm %ghoet le used ln the epplioatfon as i5Afeat~ that ii tho Ruroka Distrlot had not aontraatsd to the Whltohouse Matrlet lt vatid hare been neoassary to have o 19 ed a teachmr at a salary or Right U.uulred TM Dallarr 'PI # 0.00). On the theory that it there had been no oontraat b&wan the two Dirtrlctr, the B\rroka Mstrlot would hare employ84 som% toaohor at a salary of Right Eundred Ten Dollar8 (&lO,OO) and rould bare boon able to draw that amount iromtha Rural Aid AP opria- tlon, and that S%otion 15 of tb present Rural kid fz wtuth~~- izaa the B;ur%ka Mstrlot to transfer ruoh utu to the !&We- horue Diatrlot, the former Distrlot hao mad% applloation to b% paid such sum out of th% Rural did Appropriation nit& the xl.~~r;~tdalir%ring the 8-e upon rouolpt to the Whitehouse 1

. Saotfon 35 of Roure Bill O&3, 46th lagislaturo,'thr Rraal kid Appropriation Bill now in operatfon reads:

*SEC. 15. Transfer Of Rntize Dlstriat. On agro%ment of th.c Board of Truatoss of th% districts ooncarnrd or on patition signed by (I najorlty of the qualif isd voters of the aistriat and sub&at to the approval of the County aqer- intendsnt and Sate :;uparint%naent, the trustsea or 8 diStr.iGt Wiloh may be unablsl to maintain a satisfactory school may transfer its csntlre echo- lastlc cnrollm%nt, or any number of grades thereof, to a convenient echool of higher rank, and in euch *3 Bonoratle Burord D. Battle, I-age 3 svent, all or the fwla of a%rtriot, lnolua-

lng the State aid to which the dlotriot rauld otherwise be sotitled under t&e provlolons of this Aot, or such proportionate part thereof es may be necessary may be used in oarrying out 8ald fi@waeent .*

We have reaohed the oonolualon thet teaohar salery aid IMY be drawn by a transferring dlstriot in the mumar sought, althou& the base aniotU+t may not neoesaarily bo as auoh as that E& out in the applfeatlon. yragl pest axpUiUlO0 and existinh; facts it met bc dotermlnoQ se nearly aa oan ~bo juet what part, ii not all, of said 8m oi R@kt Hunbrod Ton DoLlara ($tlrO.OO) the JEurelfa Cltatrlot would ham b@en e&Itltld to reoeite baa it not made t&o oontraot or transfer wlth'tho nhlteholue Dlstriotr The amount thoa arrivea at should be t up as the sum to be #d the Eu~Oka Dlstrlot in re6peOt to muoh salary item if there is suHlclont money to pay all approv8d applications in full, %?lth Zhe above explanation we answ8r your first qusstion ia the arrirmatirs.

Wa 40 not answer your aeoond qu8ation in thin oplalan. If you amlre O&T oplnton 8n the subjsot matter mmtlonbd in your seoond question we would apgr8elate your furalshlng us rdth detells coneern& the sppllcatlon OS the Whltehouaa Dl@trlat*

Your8 very tmly 0lM5 It. Lowis Aseietant

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1941
Docket Number: O-3549
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.