Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
emam c. Ia”” li-uIIuu
:-*““w,c.IIoy ,..,...*^., _ -_,._- .- --
e#iAw~ theroof, ahoYlag the a
gpto dMIIa Peoeiptr frea the salo of say 0 ths above- T
.,a&mod itom for the quortor nut pwcodlag;
and uhrll l t t&o oaae tlmo pay to the 0 troller a luxury UOioo tax sqwsl to two a) ““p pardcauat& o&d ploor reoeipto u ohown by
l +e*
Ttotung hwola ohall ho oauwwd 00 u to r o qulP0 p qloEnt of tho tax d) greo o Po oelpto h0wl.n l*oiod mro thm QIQO a the promedo of ths uls of tho au4 utiolo ef lwwohRblldl8e. Arot.allulouwedhereia,maMaMleto and not fo r
l anoxry bu yo fez we 01 o onwaptlon, c beso mooipto of a oalo Malls th e l ana M.&h th e g+ur cha ao r paya, 01 rip-pees to pay feP@af srtiole o?? MawualtiJ bougtlt rt wail
”
While it mar bo w&id that geaeml4 ths VoFd “olnn” lo wed to donote money, owh lo aot ~oasouUy lto mmaUa& The oeocQd-hmd utlolo t&m in OI a papt of tb plrrpohrs* prioe 10 xm l otlcmbl~ 8 pl;ct ef tha ~‘ipto$o$ pa- &o. It 0 noted that in the tlzot o*r r r of ths ~gooso ltbetuiofix8dat~amunteqmlto reoeipts” for ths sale of ths aw rrdto; It 0eeU aSthe* 00 ths vord “ova 8ousedlnthelut olou to us that to oe&ones of seotion fi the a ‘vdus~ vould oom namer oauporting to the int&it1a¶ of the Logiorrtrzre than to limit t&o mom&q of the roti to aey and allow the o&lo to go tu mo ln8otu u the pmhMe pldoe lo rspre0eat.d by a !bmsfe~ Tu k gooda Instead of mtmoy. In OaQO for l tax ‘at th e rate o? a& 6ny eliunolt ia u- 7 5,ooo.oo up to tho mm of 50,000.00,” a Su=Qme'o t gt;i”d,tho oaoe of In ro Xlletea 8 Patrte, 1% S. I. 8.
# “gko wo of the ro-tdo ‘aaeuat’ and ‘mm
in the otatuto 10 uofortumte, a0 the00 wwdo US populbrlg wed to donot. wmey, but, U *3 suoh ?eoelpto, UUP a aowP to ow Qwotim is th8t ths awlott upa a
Yhlohtho wvll1bo Jotllw*dQl the omof)1oo.06in t&e fact l 1tuat1on ou?aaltted by you.
YOU V-Y MY