Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE A'ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
Honoreble. John R. Shook
Criminal Dletrlot San Antonio, Texas Attorafq Hr. T. 8. Rldgevay
Attention: e\,
Dear Sfr:
..;
or
as
IXo~orable John B. 83mok - Fag4 2
and gasoline and the County aooepted the& eemlaee down Julr 7, 1941, when the<#uatlen a rehearing mm overruled In Ohe abore for OQUse. TWO or the patrolmen were bfsp4ns4a dth, 14wilIg only r0tlr in the employ the countr. The rour who w&r4 wexe paid their retained salaries aad the two who were dropped fr4m the qimploy Of the Uoiuity were not paid their e&i- tlSl4S. These two patrolmen, who were eliai- nated rrcm their wmiee an July 7, 19i&ren- &wed a bill t4 the Ctiss16ners’ Qoxirt ior $285.00 l mhb, being the amount or their m- spective oalaries from rtrJr 14, 1943, to &ly 7, 190. The Court reemtly entered an order al- lowing th4ir olalm, the or&e~ beins as follcmm "We weuld like 60 &a~4 yatrr Opts UPOn raLf0dng tno questian*:
"1. x4 ft 14gt2. r0r th6 &mmL8*16a~4x8* ao?lrt *io ~TaOX the paym6nt Qi the *3 Honorable John R. Shook - Rqe 3
salarlcq or these two patrolmen rraa May 14, 194l to July 7. 194X7 *2. S1n0. the Oummi&Ei1oil4r&* aouxt ha8 entore& its order upon the ainutes or Court approving the payment or said olaims of fhs two patroloen and haling ln- stratated the Auditor to draw warrants in in payment or said taror or 84fa patrolmen elaIa., 1. It the duty of the kudltor to draw t@e ryants In pamnt thareot? *In this 4onnoatIon,w4 wieh to direot your attention to the 0.~4 or Buster Harp vs. +. 0. m&y, County Auditor or Boxer County, the readwed-#y Feurth Courtof Citil Appeal.atSi%s &6dfO, on w0r4a4r 12, ipu. Thit3 i6 not d401~i4~ report4a, but a oopy tikhbr is attaehea her&h Ii0 ratioa for rehearing ua. t%led aad this deaialoa i4 final.
-4 order or the OommImioaer~* Gosrt eU&wlag the olaim 0r .the two patr4lnmn lb ori its ra44 nliil rested ~~~oluslrely and pea-tabs to a, setter whhh is the jarladietion that Qeurt; I$ appears within ss that this order ia a fiaal $-at and ozmld only be 846 a*144 in a 4irest~pr~eeaing institut4U in the dietriat~ aouxt. The County Airtlt$qr, belag a mis1st4rial~otii44r, is not rested with judiolal power and would not be aQthCWi&Od t4 haar and wei& 4tia4~~4 u~tl past3 jtkag8i4nt upon the r8atq.
9w1il488, the ardor 0t the Ommissionsr8~ Gourt i..void, it rclold b44tm4 the aWe7 or the Audifor to i..ae the werxsnts or ~owher. there an dlreeted. It dg.8 not m&xir to u& that S&e exbe of 6he QOE- dsaioners* Ookrt is void ror the reason that oopatr 8004p64d th6 bmubrtt or the 44rtlpl4u er and, in raot, 4Ld not nr*r the patr4lS4n(, tha that their 84mfoea wWlU.b4 &&4pea.@ with armtil JQL??, 194n.
hour 0pIQIon opal the abme pue86Ioli8 w%l.l be .gpr&01.t.$.*
Eonotable J&i R. Shook - Peg. C
.
Under the raots stated in~yotkr lettsr B&X&F oopnty for the past several years and up to &ly 7, 194l, had in its employ sin patrolmen under the assumption that the law aathorlsed the appointment OS that amber of highmar patrol- Qem. Apparsntly~the ~fX~~fs&ioners* c-t sating in eon- With the Sheriff was &oti+ br view of.ArtIcl& j~O$iOa 6699~~ veraum'. Annotated civil stem%@.' 8pet&r, Sq-mme court Texas in above a&ntl&lltc:oa&& or Cha.. W. AnaOr&On. Count Judge, et al. v. will 1. Wood, am0118 other things held f hat Artiole 6699B, supa, was unoon- atit<ional.
Therero*e, it is o&x oplnioa the% said aas4 is ao euthoritr authari&lag the &samlaslonere~ mart to msks the above 8i4di0rua order.
It is oar rarthsr oplnlon ghet the oommissioners* aourt had ao authority, 4itheaf upre8se& or~fsp~ud, to make the abore noatl4mea .Qlder -4 thet said order i~.th4nrom void.
we here OarSrall~ 80nsid4r44 the eaa44 or Slubr Y. Qiity or San Aatonio. 2nd 8. w. (26) ai; Edw&ls v. Lubbook Gouatr, 33 8. W. (24) 482, and the euthorltles ofted. t&eroin, holdlirg in siieat that where oounti4s or mm$alpslitie& reoeito bon&fit& andor oonSraot& Allegal b44mme they are not in oosfomlty with the Oonstltution statutes or oherter p~~i4Ion or 4 aitr, said aoantles ox munioipalitf,ea arb U4ble on iypu8a ooqtraots rw the reaaomble raluq ai'the.betmrit# whiah thu7~have r4aeired. Houmer a4 me und&rstanU the abwe rentIoaed awms, th4 06&t an&/or the proper &th6ri~~e& or the d&&kn~~* al%~ had the'autwritf to u&a aaid aolotraat sr aontraots mat raU4a. 66 'aomp2.y M,th the aatutea Or pcori8lans or tho Mty'olmrter ~werx&iq thu 4m. Xa.oth4z wrd4, whoa a oountr Qr. nity has ribueina the buwfit 0r a v&raet whkah'if hrd the pq$r to ma@, bolf wkf#a ~&%~.n#t; ~.legaLky OnterM into, th4,4ouaty ox Qitruy b*~~Wem~dLl8d to do jut3ti04 end to,paJ the aoasi6mti6n; be..it' f4qt to pay rot what t has reseivdl. Iisxwh e.... iti.@afd'that lsu will Imply a aonWaet. Eowwu, *B do em abova'statcrd, not think that th,.~oamluiaxwrs~ omr%:ha9 ~~arrthorlt~ whstever to.~appoiat 8bo~0 msatIaneU.o,au8t~,tralMis orci44r6. It is txu'far6her ~opinion thet tmld ooua-6 had a0 oo~treet; with 44 W.&hQFit~ perfo*r~the ss~aea~.w&ish WM oeu14a sre not op rore the &we ~ntIo+i
tp4at~4ins statsd abws.
