Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
bfra. ‘Plla Kas Murphy, Presldont
State Board of Coematologl
Austin, Texaa
xhr matit
baen or la being lnatalled. to be in6taiha, that to the aiaOrOti0n of keeping leaving the Board, and that, thersrora, the monrfa 8ppropriated might be expensed, lr the Board thought l dtimbb , for the or the existing mystem. rerislon *2 *a. Ella Mae Murp4, Preai&+nt, Page 2
I in that opinion, nor aid we intend ?fo aid not hold the ma8 ~ppmprima in the rider were avail-
to imply’, that awk fo r l xpan8ltura ror the purpose or keeping up the 8xi8t- iag aymtem of reoorda maintained by the Board at the tima thm appropriation wa6 mad*. The intent of the Loglalatura aamua olearlr to hato run68 ror
bban to grorlde inatalll~ and maint8ining a 8yat0a OS neord keoplag, not to msintaln the exlating ayatem. mila la arrord8a renaiaerable latituaa the Board in asleeting the l yatem to be adopted; in determining whether a oom- that is, or whether a new l yatem pletely now system should be installed, by revision ba erfeoted of the present ayatem, it la not given to expend the funda merely to melntaln authority the existing l flrtem. We do not undertake to pass upon the question, whiok la, apparently, in dispute between rou and the other members OS the !3oard as to ðer there is in prooora a revision of system or record keopfng. the existing
Yours very truly BY R. v. 8airohila Aaalatant