Case Information
*1 .
: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
Bonereblr Dorumn Xirkrlr
Coaaty Attormy county
Wharton fuar nmrtoa,
Dur tart
88 ha+8 ?8orl+84
you l 8k tho opfnlon of thir
tiont
pmdent Bohool Dlrtriat up118 ttuiciry
orore balng all
l a0 r pidadr o? t18a of 801& 18Fw *2 . .‘,, ;-? c .-) A8 you pOlat44 t?Ut la pur brld, la the aerr of Tupe InQ4,psndgnt Sohool. f;istrlot, 97 9. s. (24) 1047,(W. 8. Ref.)'t.hIs provision ~80 held to be applloabls to al1 tfper of indep8nd8nt 6OhOQ1 dintriots. Zn Volu;le 37 of Tare6 JurIapru4entm, fag08 lOb*
1070, it I8 said1 Wherr 8X8lUII1Ve otitFO1 at tb. pub110 Q@bO818 of 8 oity or Ulstrlat lr &iv~,n to ita board ot s4uoation or tru8tBea, with power to eatablleh all rU’LQ8 8ml reguh- tiQh’I8 XIm8688Ery to X8fISt%fn 413 &ffefQnt 878tsl, 8w rogiul~tioa fAtQttd84 mb re88ombl~ Otienl8t84 to prevent of a eeatagioua 8ad 4r~mvnt8 or s rmU t&e fntroductlor!
di88666, 8UQh *II Mnl pOX, f l8 W411 Withia t&4 pm-8 Sohool b48rd8 0~69 adninIstzwtlon pmteQ. or the aftairm of r4pufrr the VaOaiMtfon ot pupils *I f~ oanditbo prsoadent to thlr And W48l’ their pw to @naab adfxira088 SttQi?h.ll88. for the proteotioa of health, Z#&&rlatire b&lea o? aualol- palitier may deny 6hIldren the ii&ht to attoad 8obos1 Ordlnaaoer rcrd r4gttletioaa of thl8 tiosr Treainatad.
MtUX8 are not in oontrsreatlen at ISOti8tftUtiOttitl &taran- ti88, 0r &O they iXitWfOl?8 With the 0~8JlntiOS at th0 o4mpubOrf rohaol law. Her are the raguletiotm objaotltm- 8ble On tha -mud tbnt 130 eS&br~Uiay ui8t8; it 18 not l I qU88tboa Wh4th4P the b48rd.8 qusatioa of WQr~QnOy, but l 6tlon 16 ar bitrary. "'lt Is not BW4J68aXy for Ba 4pia4m.h t4 WI8t or be fmminult In otiex for the rob-1 .board to be jwtli~sb t&s rqplatio~ . . . lf the In ado,-tin& and sntoraing e~aaUItIaor are suoh that they eQn8tftut4 a aQnao8 to the publio health.'"
That the bOePd of’ tFU8tQQ8 Of aa ftldspsad~t 8QhQOl lpoy under Itn sathority to mtna~g8 mQ aontrol the dietriot public 8OhW1s In sueb di8triOt ?'O$uiZ'6 7a@4iXWtf46 Of PUP118 a8 a prarcpfsitc tQ thrlr atte!xdanoe of ruoh roboo18 ha8 been aotsr&nsd In the iOllowlrt,- alllmt Strft*l et al. t. Ban haton &h-l. Bd3x4 of Yrlnoatlon at el., 2f;l 8. iv. Llj&(8.%Ret~ 1 Clt? g,yi Eh'aunrel8 at al. v. ?irld~olmIdt at al., 109 TIXI 302,
. ::, 303r Johnso* et al. v't e1ty 2r 3allas at al., 291 s.i;. 972. (a, 2. 3i8i8a.) ft 1.8 not acoasaary th:& aa anreriwncy it $8 e quccatfon whsthsr tha slatIon of tha, boar4 ia crxiet: IS rns8anab18. Booth et 81. v* Board of aequlpln(al raoolmttlon ?auaqtion of Port .<orth Ir;dapendmt
3501 (a. r;.Cia&l.) i!ueht v. "lag et al.
Ftn. for Certiorari, dirk!ad., 25? V.Sa
- 580 AmoR6Fx fB!lmu. w T3xAi ROVXO APR 27, 1942 FIRST ASS-&ANT
ATTORNEY GEITERAL
