Case Information

*1 ,. -- L. A. Woods ,‘~ of Public Instruction

Austin, Texas

Dear S,ir: Opinion No. O-4678

Re: Salary aid where entire dis- trict is transferred by con- tract under Rural Aid Bill (Acts 1941, 47th Leg.,, R. S., Ch. 549, H.B. 284, p. 880)

We have received your letter of recent date, which we quote in part as follows:

“Article 1, Section 1 of House Bill 284 provides in part as follows:

“‘Districts maintaining of one (I) enumerated per square mile are exempt from said minimum for aid for only one teacher. . . .’

“Article 8, Section 1, which provides for the transfer of an entire district by contract, provides in part as follows:

“‘All of the funds of the district, State aid to which the district would otherwise be en- titled under the provisions of this Act, or such pro- portionate part thereof as may be necessary, shall be used out said agreement; . . . .’ “This question: If such district as referred to in Article 1, Section 1 above to a salary grant on one teacher if it operates a school at home, would it not be entitled to the same amount of aid if such district contracts to another district as provided in Article 8, Section I?

- . .

[84] . . . . 3. Article I, Section 1 of House Bill 284 provides that the scholastic provisions of the Act shall be distributed “in such a way as to assist all school districts which have not fewer than twenty (20) nor more than five hundredi(500) original enumerated scholastics. . . .” That part of Section I quoted in your letter exempts districts maintaining less than one enumerated scholastic the mini-

mum requirement of twenty scholastics, and provides

Section 1 of Article VIII governs the transfer of the entire scholas- tic enrollment of a school district which is unable to maintain a satisfac- tory school. This transfer does not consist of individual transfers, but of as such. This provisions applies only to the entire scholastic transfers for the school year 1941-42. Said section reads as follows:

“Section 1. For the school year 1941-42 upon the agree- ment of the Board of Trustees concerned or on petition signed by a majority of the qualified voters of the dis- trict and subject to the approval of the County Superintendent, and Joint Legislative Advisory Committee, the trustees of a district which may be unable to maintain a sat- isfactory school may transfer its entire enrollment, or any number of grades thereof, to a convenient of higher rank, and in such event, all of the funds of the district, the State Aid to which the district would otherwise be entitled s~- der the provisions of this Act, or such proportionate part thereof as may be necessary out said agree- ment; provided that no aid shall be allowed for teachers that are not actually employed in the contracting schools.” You have informed us that some fifteen school districts in the sparsely settled portions of Texas are affected by this question, that the teachers were actually employed in the contracting schools, but that the districts have not received salary aid, and that such aid is necessary to carry agreements. In other words, the receiving school has received and taught the students composing the entire of the sending dis- trict and has employwed the teacher for such scholastics; but the sending dis- trict has received no salary aid, which it would turn over to the retieiving school under the terms of the contract.

You wish to know whether you are authorized to pay salary aid to the district under that part of Section 1 of Article VIII which provides that “all the funds of the district, includ~ing the State Aid which the district would otherwise be entitled under the provisions of this Act, or such propor- tionate part thereof as may be necessary out said agreement.” (Emphasis ,ours)

This problem will not arise in transfers of entire for school years after 1941-42, for under Section,2 of Arti- cle VIII the scholastic census rolls will be combined, and the teacher- pupil quota will be based upon the combined census total.

We are of the opinion that the school district to aid under the Act. “Otherwise” is defined by Webster’s New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged (Second Edition, 1938), as follows:

“1. In a different manner; in another way, or in other ways; contrarily; . . ,

“2. In different circumstances; under other, or any other conditions; . . . *

“3. In other respects; . . . .,

u . . . . We believe that “otherwise,” as used in that part of Article VIII which provides that ‘all the funds of the district, the State Aid would otherwise be entitled under the provisions of this Act,” simply means the State aid which the district would be entitled if its scholastic had not been transferred by contract.

Now, turning back to Section 1 of Article 1 we see that districts maintaining a school at home and having of one student per square mile are exempt and The scholastic enrollments districts have been transferred under Section 1 of Article VIII. “Otherwise” they would come within the pur- view of this provisions and would be entitled to aid “under the provisions of this Act.”

It could possibly be argued that no one could know whether district would be ‘“maintaining” a school if the transfer had not been made. The purpose of Article VIII is to provide a means for educating pupils of a district in which a satisfactory cannot be maintained. We do not believe that it was the legislative intent to penalize such school districts, , but on the other hand, to aid them in conformity with the caption Act “providing for a more efficient public school system.”

In view of the foregoing you are respectfully advised that a school district maintaining a school at home and having’less than an average of one enumerated is exempt of twenty scholastics

The entire have been transferred to another district under Section 1 of Article VIII; it is our further opinion are entitled to the same amount of aid for which they would have been eligible had the transfer not been made, which aid shall be used agreement.

Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS Assistant APPROVED JULY 6, 1942

APPROVED OPINION ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS COMMITTEE

By- Chairman