Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
Ronorable Albert J. Hutsoa, Sr.
county Attorney
Trinity County swaa
c7moeton. of publie inatruati&a lc teabent
aa selatant the authority to ap- 14 drawn against nehool dfatrlota 01 5. Art. 2693.
eposltory bank of a rchool dl8trlot ,011. a logal* drawn warrant, that ha been approved by aa ASSXS‘EUST Superintendent of ?ublic Instruotion, an4 euoh warrant was f6r the benefit of tho sohool dlstrtot, would the sohoal dlstrlot bs authorlmd to rac)ovOr the aoney paid on suoh warrant from the Uep~sito~~ baatrO *2 Honorable Albert 5. Hutson, Jr., Page 2
"1 think the anrrwef to thle quostlon is *no*.
Gem kfoody vs. Chosrhrr, 183 LX. 23.
Vour pmnpt an8wera to the above question8 will be greetlg t@preo16teU.w
In vlmr of the prorlelon 'of the state Constiixtlon oited in your letter and the holdiq of the .iuprene Cw.rt in the casa or Carpenter ~8. Shrppard.et al,- ,145 3. :v. (26) 562, your rirst :ilmtion St la the opinion or this that dbparta@nC in the efflnnatlv~ sad is SO answered. should ba answered -+ tillnk that nr ur eeooJl& qusstloa an4 third quution me anawen4 in our opi ona Nos. O-1507 an&O-1507-A. There- fore, we are scoloaing oopler o!' them oplnlotm in answer to thee0 questions. Ye dLS0 ~biOmt3 0Opi0~ Qr OUr ~Opik~~9 NO& 0-604-A
ad C-3295 pertainiry to similar guaetfona rwardlng a ooubty ~ckool superintendent under tha faots state4 In tIma@ uplnlone.
Trusting that the foregoing fully ansvmra your in- qulry, we rre