History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-4912
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1942
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 ORNEY GENEKAL OFTEXAS

Honorable ,John Q. McAdsms

Commissioner,

Department of Banking

Austin, Texas

Dear Mr. McAdams: OpinionNo. O-4912

Re: Whethsr or not a corporation may be organized under Title 16 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas having trust and dis- count powers only, without the reauiremsnt of full payment of it6 capital in cash.

We beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter asking an opinion from this department upon the above-capitioned subject matter, the letter being as follows:

“*I*,

"In view of the above please advise this(Dspartmant aa to whether or not a corporation to be organized under theilprovisions of Title 16 of the Revised Statutes of Texas, 1925, having bnly trust and discount powers, without the Dower to receive deposits, can be incorporated without the full payment of its capital in cash."

Article 376 of the Revised Civil Statutes provides: "Five or more .persons, a majority of whom shall be residents of this 'State, who have associated themselves by written articles of agreement ss~*.prdVid&%y *iiS general corporation law, may be incorporated for the purpose of establishing: (a) a bank of deposit or discount, or both of deposit and discount; (b) a banking and trust company; or (c) a savings bank. + * *"

It will be seen that the statute authorizes a bank of deposit or discount, and likewise a banking and trust company.

The power to accept deposits is not the sole exclusive banking function; the power to discount paper is itself a banking function. See; Zollman on Banks and Banking, 2% 4061-2. This is not only true generally,-but especially so in the lip&t of the (a) clause in the foregoing statute. Section 16 of Article XVI recently amended is as follows: "The Legislature shall by general laws, authorize the incorporation of *2 Honorable John Q. McAdams - page 2 , O-4912

corporate bodies with banking and discounting privileges, and shall provide for a system of State supervision, regulation and control of such bodies which will adequately protect and secure the depositors and creditors thereof.

"No such corporate body shall be chartered until all of the authorized capital stock has been subscribed and paid for in full in cash. Such body corporate shall not be authorized to engage in business at more than one place which shall be designated in its charter.

"No foreign corporation, other than the national banks of the United States, shall be permitted to exercise banking or discounting privileges in this State.'l

We shall now determine whether or not the case of Kaliski v. Cossett, Banking Commissioner, 109 S.W. (2) 340, writ of error refused, cited by you, has any effect upon the question propounded. That case involved the constitutional double liability imposed upon shareholders in cor- porate bodies "with banking and discounting privileges", as applied to the Peoples,' Finance Company of San Antonio, incorporated under and by virtue of the provisions ofSubdivision 29 of Article ll21Revised Civil Statutes, 1911, later Subdivision 48 of Article 1302 Revised Civil Statutes, 1925. The court held that such corporation was not the corporate body whose shareholders were liable to the superadded liability of the Constitution, because the Peoples' Industrial~Bank was not authorized to "exercise banking and discounting privileges." In the course of the opinion the court did say:

"We are urged to change the word 'and' to 'or', and read this phrase "banking or dlscounting::.privileges, ' but we see no justification for such a construction, for unquestionably the word 'banking' includes discounting. The words 'and discounting' might be treated as surplusege, and the section read to mean that shareholders in banking corporation should not be issued until all of its stock had been paid for'in cash." This language, we think is a dictum, for it is not the basis to any degree whatever, of the court's decision, that decision being as ebove stated. However that may be, it is quite significant that the writers of the Constitution in the last paragraph of Section 16 expressly declared, "No Foreign corporation, other than the national banks of the United States shall be permitted to exercise banking or discounting privileges in this State." (Emphasis supplied). Obviously, the convention did not consider c'iscounting an indispensable element of banking, or, in other words, banking as including discounting.

But, entirely aside from the Constitution, the conslusion hereinafter expressed would be compelled by Article 377 of the Hevised Civil Statutes. Upon these considerations, you are respectfully advised that a banking corporation organized in the manner and for the purposes suggested by you *3 Honorable John Q. McAdams - page 3, O-4912

would not be entitled to receive a charter until all of the authorized capital stock had been subscribed and paid for in full in cash.

Very truly yours A??IORIiEX GEX3RALOFTEXAS BY a/ Ocie Speer Ocie Speer Assistant OS-MR-cg

APPROVED OCTOBEB 17, 1942

s/ Gerald C. Mann

ATTORNE?Z GXNERALOFTEXAS

AFFORVED: Opinion committee

By BJB, Chairman

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1942
Docket Number: O-4912
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.