*1 ,_.~. ’ c 383.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF.TEXAS

. AUSllN :

!

Eonomble N. E. Kh$te, Dlreator

Texoe Forest Servioe

Agrioultwel and Meohanioal College

Oollege Station, Texer Opinion No. O-

Dear 8lr: We &ate reoelved nsldered the let- ters you cent tis;-- ':irKiiGiiiii aubmfttod ae re- queatlng the opinion of thl to whether a oounty osll ‘la~~fullp expend or oont nd8 to aid the Foreat Fire Fight olvlllan &etense of printin& aer- or&anleatlon, by aertlfloates ‘for suoh ~~rvloe.

tab

thie State that the O~II+ miseloners* court orlty 88 Is expreeely

n It by the Constl’tution find any oonstitutlonal or authorize the commle~lonere~ ty fund6 far the purpose set !

Opinion No. O-4074 oi,this department holds that 8 )ouaty ia not authorized to expend. oountf lulade to aid the :lrr rationflyl and sugar rationing ti!ow* ; *2 1

I. . -

: \ j

382 gonorable iv, Et’ White, Dire∨ Page’ 2

Under the authoritlee!olted in oplnlona Noa. O-l,529 and O-4074, it ie our opinion that 18 would be illegal for eny oounty in ,Texaa tc ‘expend o6untf funda ror the purposea’ l ln rour lettrro. mentioned !