Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
gonoJable Dan Y. Jaokson
;tietriot Attorney
Boustan , Texas
r- 31s , Iats ,O f aturs? And n(i thereto. In part below
you raquestsd two ralateli questions:
Ohapter 109, Acts oi the Wth Bill 100. 880, iagular se*- .3iV81y to the United stat8S’ na granted by Iiouse Bill No. 53OV th8 QpiIiien tbt B. a. No. 580 does t, &WUlt8 Bi&& NO. 126 Of the same Certainly, there is no express Bill repealing the Senate Bill, end repeal by implioation is aat Parored. The aaoepted rule is Ql8arl.n +gpr?saed in 39 Texas &IX., Sec. 76, page 140, in the folXi+i'lng lan,:u&Ee:
Honorable ;)8s %. Jaakson, page 2 "Acoording t:j numeroue pronounoemente OS the , Texas courts, tho ropeai of atatutos by ImplIoatIan Is never favored or presumed. The two aots wIl1 per- sist unless the conflicting provi8ions are so anta&o- nistia and repugunant that both aaunot stand. :Hhere there is no express repsal, the preawdption is that In enactin a new law tke Legislature intended the old statute to remain in operation.*
The multitude of authorities oited in the text support the rule.
Another rule of even @eater fOXWe I8 thati
where both aote are paaaod by the name seeuion of the legislature, It will be premumed that th8 1egIalature Intended for both aote to rtand. 70~ a statement ot the rule 8ee 39 Tex. SW., Seo. 98, pa&o 146, 8tated In the fOllOWbg 1kn@I438! I8 mup:osad to be ” . The Legislature governed ip'one l pIrIt and polio7 during a remrlon,
i asd nothing ohort pf a direot repeal in expre88 term, I or 8uOh lrreoonoIl(able repuguanoy a8 that both aOt8
oannot stand together, will justlip a oourt In holding an aOt 18 rep8ahd by another aat pa8aed at th8 came ! 8888ion. . . .”
You are, therefore, adVi8ed that It 18 OUX Vi8U t!mt 3. B. No. 186 I8 not repealed by H. B. No. 580, I
Pa8sing now to the effeot of these two bIll8, we enolose herewith oopioa of two OpInIOn8 of th18 departskent reaently releaeed, Opinion No. O-5290, pa8oing upon the oon- of the88 two bills, and o&don No. O-5363,
t 8titUtiOlltiit.y upon the liability of land held In the name of the United stat.88 ror State and oounty ad valoram tares. WS belie*8 that these two opInIon8 afford a 8uffloIent guide ror your office withO\jt f'uNA8r CI~SWSS~OU.
I
FL
: P %ECL slatant
