Case Information
*1 460 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN . *(*MN
)‘L‘“IL
vablo meru of Labor Statlrtior John 0. Rood, Cotirrioner
b&in, teu8
g.8r blrr
lrtloa of 0~ l 8pi0fee 0r m y 0 8ha brater em- of rliteea Je8r8 to mill, VOFk8hOp, 18Ull- OVO8 8nd oitie8 Of atloa, according to 11 be fiaed not less 0111W8 LlOF Store than TV0 ~UIldl’ed for not maore than risoaed ln jai1
ite evident that the distribution of aeus- paper8 18 aot vlthla the purviev OS any of the lxohibitlre en- ploymeats a8 appear In the above quoted article unless it be oi re88enger rervloe la tovna or cltle8 of more th8a flf- that thOu88nd pOpti8tiOQ. teen Neither the courts aor the Legislature has eluoldat-
cd qon or rendered a deficition for "messfa&er service" es under dlscusslon. Webster's iiev Iatern;tior.- csed la the article al :ic;:mar7, 3econC Piition, def'lncs "mcsscq~r-" a3 'one uk,.-
46Y Honorrble John D. Read, pge 2 0 doe8 aa l rrmd.’ Although it oould be 8rgued
be-8 l U888a@O perta- e888g@ l [8] th8t 8 vho boy la 8 general -2 dOO8 nev8mpeF8 dellVer8 the to a8v8 of the belleve day, ve do not bear it 18 3f the kind of w88en#er 8errlee lntetied to oow vlthln the reap ot Artlale 12nD IB Other V&8, l %OUIOap” t0 Oo# rerrlee’ nut be a owunloa- vlthln the purrlev of wrreqer tlaa of l per8om1 luture rwh l 8 l telegru or note,
At 8a8t t& delivery Of WV8p8pOr8 18 l dlrtrlbutloa .of the mrobadlre of l publlrhlng ro8p8ny. The eourt in the Corpor~tloa 1. Yllroa, 21 8. W. (2d) @me of A88ooiated bdemity 314, vrlt ot error Nfuaod, held that the mployment of ohildren wder flfteea par8 of rge to dellrrr paokrger aad merahmdime OS the esploJer 18 OOt laterdlotetl b7 Artlale 1573.
It 18 therefore the opinion ot thlr dopnrtmeat that
your qW8LlCbU b o l MVOrOd la the JLO&atlvO.
Vary truly your8