History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-5789
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1944
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 -. ‘.’ . . . . . . . -

(.. ‘( OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

lkmorablo Olereland &ml 8 Attoraey

oounty Bnrorla Oounty

Angleton, Texa8 Mr. E. 9. Stone, Jr.

Attention:

near 8lr: 1onM~th0Mlarl

oounty aaa their doputlo

sentenoe of Artfole 39oa ,&u&6,8 ho ~appolntmant of deputie8 *8aid appllaatlon shall be aeaompaaied by a statsneat uler- ing the probabh reaelpts Srom teer aasalmlons and oompanmtlom to be oolleotod .bp u&l oirloe d~lng

the flsoel year ana the pnrbablo dlrrbumememt welsh

&all inalu&e 611 iralarlea urd expen806 of m~%d of-

floei and uid aourt ahall mak@ it8 order mathoAlclng l p~0i&tmWXt Of 8U6h dr&bie8, a8Si8tlLnt8 and

. Oh*8 aad rlx the aompeneatloaa to be paid them

irlthia thb llaitatlonr herein pXW88tibed and de-

terxine t&e number to be appointed a8 in the di8- cretloa of said aourt 8hall be proper........* hn8 been rai8ed under the above w que8tfon that thlr prevl8loa amy be a llaltatloa quotation ~Upon th8 Comi88ioaer8Q Court in authorix%q expendl-~ by eJl Ofttaet OIL the 8&w

- tUlW& Of OrtiC ba8i8 in 0x0088 Of t&O fe88 eqmSb'by tid OitiiOO.

ing probable'fee8 of-6rfiqe i8 for a gpid*~amIhelp

ior t&l 0oPurie81OtleI’8’ court; la it8 Uontlaa, to

fix the uihrie8 Of the ofrloe~.a8 wall a8 MbflO8

Or depUtie8 ilad W@l8t6$lt8 but 18 Ii0 1ltitatiOn e8 t0

auabei.

.

l Uader the stntute it is my opblon, that. the ehall be tixed at-.the

'alaries or eleatea ~&ers

Hoabrable Cleveland Derls, peg6

first regular meeting of thb hamlulon~~~ Court aail the ealariea.of the depot168 ahell llkewl8e'be tired at that tlae, sad the next regular meetly oi.the'Oom- mlsaloaers* Court will bo lioadey, January 10, 1944. We thereiore'iW&e that if pO88lble you lot us hale en opinion on or before Jcauery 10. then under the stet- t&C tbb cOfIUd88iOIWS' cOUZ% w PO0888 rXWA 6~ t0 . Qay ifar a reek and etlll be in regular-term. There-

fore please let em hme the opinion not later than yea- uery l-3 or 14.w has:a popula- hae8tatbd in your letter,, Brczoria county the 1940 Pederal C44d8. tion 0r 27,069 hihabitant aeoordl~to

Thererore the oouatp aiflolels 0r osld county ere~o0mjmasatea oa en annual,salary besi8.

Art&a3 3912e, Beot$on 13, Vemonts,Amotatsd OlAl salax$e8 or ell the-rollewlag aeme&oiiioeti towit: shsrlfr, a8w88or and oolleotor ~0s~ ~ooanty atttu3my,.laalUdlag orlmlnel :&l8:~ oouaty attarneys who perrozwthe Ah1tic)8 ,bt attoraey8i. dibtrlot .olerlc, ooiuaty ale*; tr6amWti'~hldr. dlstriot .aW anbgl lmpbator~. T&e 8alarle8 of eald orflolala dare &&'I.' ~~_ #. ,. ~: .+&;i.:::~ e q&t :.%a~., .Q+;::the : t,4t& :&WC.-& :by&hm .~ia,,.~~~~~~l~~L1,;-. . . oapncltlee far thq flwal'year.1935 and not aabe thaa:the ma%@&.

emoun~~alloued suc&-o~rlcera:tauleP law8 e%lstlng 011 Aa&nst 24, . .

1935. Stated another-way; the ~8tatUte flxse the salary oi eeah. _ aoynty offlola at not lees thea the total 8U4 e8rneQ by himin hlti offlalel oapairtty ror the fl8orl year 1935. end aot ure than:.

the mnxbum amcunt sJloned~8uch~otflcer UILabr lew8 e&t* on

$l;OOO,OOO.OO vnlu@lon. Sal4 )25,000,000.00 raluatl4n~4ver and abote.the lpaxlnm smont ril~aea su4h ofrloe~ 011 lugpet S?& 1935. UnQel’ laW8 4ri8ting You ere~reepeotf%llj aQvi8rd thet thi Comd88fOnOM'

Court or Srezoria CcUaty has'the legal autho.rltp fd, .tlx the mlary of .eech or *e above nama ottlol~18 at .aot leas than tetal 8ua earned by him in his ofrla*al oapeolty for the f i8oal yea

1935 and not mere than the maximmamouut allowed e~oh offloer

. *4 pa%6

Soaorable Glbvelenb Davis,

under hwe ex%log oa;August 24, 1935.. A8:8ald oouitty has a

populitloa of maria than 20,000 and 188s.thaa 37,500 lnhabitantr

acoordlng to the 1940 Federal Cbnsus, ana an arsbs8ed raluatlan

la exoe8s or ~lj,OOO,OOO.OO aooordiag to thb la8t approve& pre-

ceding tax roll oi such county, the maximum amount ellowed such a$ for saoh (l;OOO,OOO.OO

orlloer8 ror 8alarlcs may bb ihLO~lt8~d raluattod or rraotloael part thereor la 6x0*8* 4r 8ald $15.000,-

000.00 valuation over qd above the maximum amount a8 allowed

suoh orflcers under laws exlstlog on Augtiet 21~. 1935. (See thb

ociaes of Yaoogboohe8 County v. Jlnklns, ll+O 8. U. (26) 901, and

Neoogaoohss Oounty t. Winder, 140 8. W. (24) 972.) Artiolb 3902, Vernoa*s Annotated~Glrll Statutes, pro-

vides in part:

" . ~; . The oompepsat$on whloh w~bc allored ahe depUtie8, a8d8tant8 or olerks abme naabd for their 8drvioes 8hall bb a mdsona~le Oae,. ‘not to a%- oud the SoUouing aqount8:

0 . . . . .; "2. %a ooUn&8'havl~ d pk&atioa ~oi 0+&y- *~,y*.~$~~~>~e &&~~~):: &&&;&+::$h., " ".. L: :ii~.~.:~::;i?'.i';:;;:; :l$i":~:...l::. ','. ;..~.l.;,:..~n.'.::iu~~~~.~.. thi&aaatl $3~4 hundred-( 3?*500) inhabit- . thirty~seveh 'ant8, flrat ~aulatent or.,ohief Aeputy#et to exceed

TwoThou8andDollar8 (#2;OOO;OO)pbr&inum; atheras- or clerks not to 4#eee$ Seienteen

8i8ttit8, depUtiCI8, Buad~d~Dolla~ ($1;700~00l'per annwn~~h+~ .iP In rlew.4r Art1016 3902~. veraon*d~Amiotate6.Olrll Stat-

utee, you~~are re8peotrully idvised that it-~$a our opinion that

the Coraml88lot1m~.aourt~ of,Bratorla Countyr~~~has~~tke legal author-

ity to flx the salarlas of,thb deputlee of *he rerioue county of-

ilolal.8 eat any rea8onable amount provided a&& 8mount8 do not ox-

coed the axlmuu mount mentioned in paraQaph 2 a8 quoted above.

The 8elarle8 0r first a8818tant8 or ohler dbputlos can.~ot~exoebd

the sum of (t?,OOO.OO eaoh per annum. The 8alarie8 of.other e8- slet8nts, deputies or elerk4 oannot exoesd )1,700.00 par annu+

sash. Art1816 3902 rlxes the mulmum ealar$ of asslstsnts, depu-

tie6 and clerks but da68 not fix the m$aiBum stiary OS said 8a-

al8taat8, dbputle8 or clerka. It i8 our further eplqlon that County Commlsslomers* Oourt of Bra%orla'Oounty ha8.th4 legal

authority to rlx the salaries 0r the various county QfflCiai8

named above at any e~~ount~, proriaea,.tha Iralary of each oftic4r

1s not 1688 than the mlnlmum 8tatba or morb then the merimllln abwe *5 Sonorvrble Clsoeland Cavls, jxge ,$

allowed by law en hsrotofgre mtntlaned and $hat the salarieo of

the d&putise may be fixed at anp reasonsb1.s mm net e%oeeUlng

the iparimun heretofore mentioned regardleas or the amount oarned

aa iem and 0omal11alons by said county ctl"i6lale in their of-

floial oapeoitlee.

Ws.thank you for the brief and yqur opinion rhtah h@r aided ua In passing upon your queatlon.

Yours very truly ATTCRXWY OEWICRAL O? l%XAB ,,

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1944
Docket Number: O-5789
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.