History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-5844
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1944
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 . . . . . . . . .

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN OllOVII SILLI”.

r-y-r”c* o&..a

::

Honorable Jesse Jamos

State rreasurer

AusLin, Texas

Dear br. James:

total of $2,86

ious accounts, which had ever

t the above aruounts, belonged the State and the custody or the State, ve

nks covering the accounts and tional Ilank, Austin, ssioner of Insurance b institute‘ .80 & blind institute .I58 rguson,Crockett Hoad Districts 16.25 ards, State Treasurers berdeau, Treasurer

State Labor Comudssion '16 .oo Texas l~ehabilitati.on Conmission (Adm.Fd.) 3.22 Charley Lockhart, State Treasurer Trust Fund 127.68 9f37.71 #Austin NatiomL Ilank, Austin, Texas

5. li. Terrkll, Comptroller $ .?o .m *2 .honorabse Jesse Jauiev -

*Capitol National Lank, Austin, Texas - Sam Sparks C. D. Special 1820

State Land Account 1928 l,I#1!3.03 $2,255.40 'Parmers & herchants State Dank &: Trust Co., husk,

Texas State Uospital, Susk;Texae (26 Years Old) 6 .oo 6 .oo $ *r'irst National Bank, tIuntsville,Texas I. AL. Dickey, Prison Account $ 15.17 15.17 vFirst National Bank, Waco, Texas

State Uanking hoard (1925) $ 177.54, 177.64 *Guaranty Bank & Trust Co., Gatesville, Texas.

Juv&nile Training Free Textbook Fd.( $ 26.20 $ 25.20 (1938) TOTAL $2,667~ .The above banks have paid drafts drawn on them- selves, signed Jesse James, State Treasurer, Por the amounts indicated and charged same against the accounts as listed.

*Ye are without information relative to the origin- al source of the runds in question other than that they have been held by the banks a,s inactive accounts for a period rang- ing from seven to twenty-five years.

*The sum 'of @.,667.32 having been,nithdrawn from the banks by State Treasurer's draft is now held in The State Treasurer's Suspense account.

aWe respectfully request your advice as to whether those funds can be transferred from the Treasurer's Su?pense account, and if so to what State funds they should be credit- ed.'

1x1 our Opinion No. O-245, addressed to Honorable Tom C. king, State Auditor , .of date January 15, 1940, con- struing the pertinent statutes, we said: .

tionurable Jesse Jams

"The readin,% OS the above quoted Article clearly indioates t!!at the procedure for final payment into the Sta,te Treasury is by the is- suance of a deposit varrant. Such deposit warrant is issued to the particular fund to shich the money goes. Lt is true, then, that until the fund to which the money should go is determined the deposit warrant to that fund cannot be issued for such money. For this reason, it is our opinion that in a case where money is paid to one of the departments of the State, and there is a question as to which par- properly he paid into the Suspense Fund because ticular fund said money should go, the same may [*] said money cannot be placed into the proper fund until a deposit warrant for such money is drawn. Only then is the money paid into the Trcasurg + ihilo the particular destination of the fund is in question, even though there is no question as to the State's right to the money, we feel that the money comes within the category of *money which is awaiting the time when it can finally be taken into the Treasury* as set Out in Article 43138. You are, therefore advised that in cases where there is an actual doubt as to the particular fund to which a money should go said money may properly be placed in the Suspense Fund by the head of a department."

In view of the rule there nnnounced, it is the opinion of this Uepartment the items mentioned by you .~ whose source and status as State property are unhnown, must remain in the Suspense Account until in some way the proper status and disposition thereof arc ordered. by a court of competent jurisdiction, or by legislative act.

The court method could be by an escheat procdcd- ing, under Title 53 of the hcvised Civil Statutes.

Under the facts stated by you, we deem it to be within the realm of your duty to call the matter to the at- tention of the District.or County Attorney of this county, under Article 3273 of the iteviscd Civil Statutes of the above title, to the end thathe may institute the proper *4 Honorable Jesse James - page 4

proceeding to have the funds escheated to the State of Texas, in which proceeding the proper disposition oT the Eoneys may be bade.

Very truly yours ATLTTUdlil+X tiliNE~iAL UI: ‘l’EXA 0 S-Ail&

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1944
Docket Number: O-5844
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.