Case Information
*1 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF TEXAS
AUSTIN 11. TEXAS Opinion Ho. O-6452 Dear 19lr: rxc Cgnstnmtion of Art. 7452,
. . ., lg& mlhlng to exuaptiorm in favor of retedn8rUnr regletrrlng undrrr prior aot.
You hwe nquemted the opinion of Ml8 Depwtmemt as to whether one in a reoognizcd 8akwol of vetorlnery mdioirw and hmvlng two yean rive years of aotual ae a veterinprian prior to the year practice 1911, may re under the 9mvlaions of title Aster aa a veterlnarlur $r, 8-7465, lnoluaive, R. C. d., l%?f5. lp7, A&S. 7 Artlole 7451 prohibita the praatics of veterinary wdlclne by eny person who has not complied with tie provisions cf Title 127, md who ha8 not registered with the dLatr%at clerk of the county of Art. 7452 oets out aertain to Art. 7451, hir mmldence. sxoeytione awng &ah is the provl8ion that cne “heretofore regiatem4 as a veterinary auqgeon ln the oounty of hi0 realdenae aacordirq to the provieiom of Ctupter 76 of the Aotr of the Regulv Session ot the lcn view ef the expre86 lurguage oi the *bovo quoted rt8tute we th%nk it elw tht ma mu m~trPrtI.on of a veterinar%an is mfhoriwd thereby beoauae 0r hir fmwr pxwtloe or odueation - th e l zatute mmly euthtMr@d Ris oontlnue+S pnratioe b ~WWI or di ton8 of 1.
pa4orbnful~rtr&lou Mdwadwth4llafted oun gmAwt*" eertlfxoee. L
It 1~ rlnorrvl hoped that our VleW8 on this mttor will k OS auida8ee L you.
Your8 very truly A-P-W1FpxAs
8/ SJgebe Alvla
msene Alvia Ar618tant
