Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
the eokauwledginents, sad 10 fu 81) I hers beon able to learn naver made a atkargm either $0 the shrrltt or oap otliw person ?er moh aa?- rloea am a fotuy PubUo. lo oharm warn l vw mdi to Bidalp uoaaty. m mreaba of 19u th*.6barltt'* 6alo an tax p?opertloa was an- tlmlall$largo. Short&# a,ftar the Shartff'r Derdr had .boul turned over to the Ooua8y thus ram presented to aa a bill fm $148.00 fop liofuy f**a.
US anaurtadl Bhrt @or opinfon O-5356 by a former ALBtoraey Donerel, 4udd 0. ~fsa2u1, the Attorney Oeasral hap ruledI +&at it was le(gaI- tm i depaay rherltt on .a diralght ,.,, ,.. ..:;.::
Honorable B. F. aCcKe8, Faga )
wFowth, aestmlng that It wouId br legel tar euoh ehar$ee to be ~tlei to the Cbtuttt- for nrtloae ar a Motuy Publlo, 18 It poeeltila fos e de My sherift, en aaployaa of ths County, to lneb P t&to a suit against the County uhloh roqld. atiers the aoIhotlon of thla aoaouut?
Honorable E. F. MoKae, Page k
aoocmpanylng suah report with laoolore oovulng euoh putbhaeor and rtquleltlane lse~oed by him in support of eaoh report. IS eaoh rxpenere Es in- oartrd in oon~~otloa dth eey par~loalu oaer, euoh rrpost ehell mna euah oeea. Saab report, involoee, and r~qul8lbloas ehall be subjsoti to th8 aualt of the oounty auditor, if any, othat- wlu by the Commlemloii~re Court, an4 ii it sppeare sthat~ any item wee not bmurmd by such oflleet, or that euoh item ~II not l neo reeary or legal oxpwme of euah offlo*, ot rohamd upcm ptopsr rrqrtleltlon,'ettah ltam she1 r bo by sela oeuaty
'980 ~l#$slot~ditio rlull bo peld by tha 8tete *5 Hldr&o CwMtiy oOmpeneet+e6 lk emaMy offlaorm aa ot on antwl salary, aad the prorlolfme of Seo-