Case Information
*1 , OFFICE~OF THiZ’ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
._. Ti *2 hrticfa 3537, 2. 5.. 1925, fi;:no tk3 cs2fensntP2n &CJ thij CClll!?.‘;~ ,?f;TX?rj?i?l’ j’CZ! hf3 norvIc33, ‘CPCEd tipxl tS3 XJ?l~:~ Of tjjts x>i?ti?3r’ZT .z.lSa:C$2.j.
Srticlo 3538 ~rovldao:
was Coq&zwlll?r, ou’rcacipt or tics rolls, chsll glvs tha uaScGsor an 0rGcr oa tha coLlsctor or his cobnty for the euount due hisz by ths Stats .for-aateasixx ttz State taxeo:r to bo pid cut of tho’first aoixty 00uaOt6a fcr,thzt yar. . . .*
Article 3391 p;rovidon: 631 fdco'due ~~~38 not co>lactcd, as by ‘Article 297,
c;hom iu*& rapart required still be. collected by t&s iifficor to \rhoea office ttm foes wxrwl, end sh3l.l be dlspcisad of by
oold officer ia eccordqm .r.%th tho prooloicns
of this Act. . . .” .~
Th9 ophlon of Aseh+4nt 2..ttornoy Ceasral X~s08, i;l Fsbz&y ,153$i, reforrad. to in your lottcr, xuled. that *all tees due and not collectofi ~%hezi ;t.ha orficial earnlz~ the sous zqtilrx~ frtx offlco skuld &a .colle.ctsd by ths prooant lneudw3t of ths ofZim* ) l%P, a’s t&2 f5u~2!0~0 ‘Ccnlrt 5316 in Xllls Ccunty v. ‘ilhq?a0n, 66 9. $1. 4%
T’h~tlpson hlpa caesed to be tho ‘offioer to W~GS~ ofmo ths .ma +w2ruod~, ati haa,nc a~-
thority to collsct the ~~oonay .after ha aeut ixat ‘i”kzt duty dcvolrsd uponhIs snoceoscr. O+- ocflce. L
. v..”
T&o psi~~iple announced there& ie controlll~ in tha Lrtntont CBE~., ana tharofors it 1s ttx+ opinion of this espnrtwnt that ths order providsil ‘far In l rticls 3538, eupzii, - .bo ,C%VG~ t9 ::r.- ~:~lzzo~d's SUCCESSOR, vii0 %iLl bo tie hXl0 lncuxb6nt of the cf~ici st tira the t&3 a33ess2i;at rolls are flldd *itit you.
. .
Axtsm 3cadl9-a
AssLstont basistar& : -.
._ f