Case Information
*1 Ol+FlCE OF THE ATTORNkY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
G~~“ER SECLERS ~-tat% GumnAt.
Eonorabie X. L. Hinson, Jr.
County Auditor
Folk County Liviwston, Texas Opinion 80. O-6689 ’
Dear Sir: - : Be:’
f
~a, but before such payment can be nado for 945, it v~lll be neccwmry to afi:end the county budgot.
Article 689a-11, iernonc s Annotated’ Civil Statutes,, in In part es follov~s: . .
$89 * * ;/h&x the budset &.s bce;l flnally ap- proved by. the Comissloncrs~ Court, tho budget, RS apyrovod by the Court, shall be filed with tho Clerk of the County Court, and tuxco levied only in ac- cordance thereaith, and no expenditure of the funds _.
of the county shall thereafter bo mdo eioept in strict ~0npllf~1o5 with the budget as adopted by the court. Except that emrwnoy cr2enditures, lq, case of grave public neoseoity to met musuol anZ un- fo?asocr. coilditions \vh?bich could Got, by reorronibly dil!.ze%t thb@t and attention, have been luoludod in the ori&ia.I budsot, may from tim to tke be authorized by the Cotit os amn~ents to the .
origin01 bud&, t * *n
This ~opartmnt hcs ruled that the Comissioners* Court of a couuty is v;ithout authority to naze any cqmd.ituv35 of fusds of the county not in oompliome with the budgot, except caorgency ox?anditurss in ca-** =r of 6;ravo publio adcomity, aa 6(39a-11.. Tie eoolose herewith copies outlined by maid Arti.cl5 or our Opinlom iios. CbjOj3-A and 0~51&, each.of which con: tains a full diacuasior. of the b&get Icvf ,and how 6cmc oan bo mfs~&? a,
SYD:W oilcls,
