1861, addreosed to Honorable ller of the Vnlrerni ty of Texms, ap- 0, we held conveyed to that property or the ume and benefit ni the ~nlter- pt from 811 tuer- Te thjnk this to the quentiim you mtmlt, and that of mid tax IS exempt from the payrent ntj Jmpror9Pl~t nlstrlet YO. 1. Te en- to t.he Rurles Clone herewith II CODJ of Rafd opfnjon.

Xo addition to the authorjtier cited In the 8hore opinion, we 0~11 your attention to an o~inlm wrgtten by the the ease of Lowr Colorado River Ctwrt of Cjrll Appeals in v. Chemical Bank & Trust Company, 18R 6. ‘1. (2) Authority the Court of Clril Appeal I held that the Lower 401, In shlch Colnraln River Authority was exempt from the pawent of all tnxea on Its property r?-ich Is used for xorenment.al pur- poses.

lmor8blr Glbb Gllohri~t - page 2

Thl8 1K)?nln~, Ootober 31rt., the Supreme Court l f- firred the fudpnent of’ the Court af Civil Appea111.

It Id tbemfere our opinion that the Aglaul tural & Yeo b8nlr8I Cellem lo l ampt tram tb o paymmt of tax00 to tie Burlooom Oomtl Dlmtrlet )lo+ 1. Improbmetat