History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-6878
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1945
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1

The ATtominis Gienfral. of Texas

Grover Sellers

ATTORNEY GENFIRAL

Honorable R. W. Calvert
County Attorney
Hill County
Hillsboro, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion No. 0-6878 Re: Authority of the Commis- sioners' Court of Hill County to appoint a manager for a county owned airport.







We have received your letter of recent date in which you make the following inquiry: "Hill County owns certain land on which the Commissioners Court of Hill County proposes to build an airport under and by virtue of the authority contained in Article 1269h, V. A. C S. The Court does not wish to operate and manage the airport after it is built and has asked me for an opinion on the following questions: "1. May a Commissioners Court lease a county owned airport to an individual or indi- viduals for a stipulated rental? "2. May a Commissioners Court appoint a manager or managers of a county owned airport and contract with such manager or managers to pay him or them a percentage of the receipts from such airport as compensation for his or their services? "I am disposed to answer question No. 1 above 'no' and question No. 2 'yes' for the reasons hereinafter stated but I should like to have your opinion in the premises. "It is axiomatic that a Commissioners Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and has no power except that conferred by the Constitution or legislative act or necessarily inferable therefrom. Landman vs.

*2 Hon. R. W. Calvert, page 2, 0-6878

State, 97 S. W. (2) 264 (Writ refused.) Howard vs. Henderson County, 116 S. W. (2) 479 (Writ refused). It follows that a county has no power to establish, maintain and operate an airport except under authority and in the manner provided by Article 1269h, V. A. C S.

"Necessarily, the power to establish an airport and to operate it impliedly authorizes a commissioners court to appoint some suitable person to manage and operate it. In my opinion, it does not follow, however, that the power to lease such county property would exist because theoretically, at least, this would result in the leasing of county property for private profit.

"It seems to me further that a proper construction of the legislative act above referred to excludes the power of the Commissioners Court to lease airport property. In this connection, I call attention to the fact that Paragraph D of Article 1269h grants the Commissioners Courts of the several counties power to lease airports to 'any incorporated city or municipality within such county or to the federal government.' The same paragraph confers upon a city the right to lease an airport to a county. Paragraph E further authorizes the governing bodies of cities to lease '---to any other person, firm, or corporation, to carry out any purpose necessary or incidental to national defense or training incidental thereto' but no such power is granted to Commissioners Courts. Since this power is specifically granted to governing bodies of cities and is not granted to commissioners courts the statute would be construed to deny the power to commissioners courts."

Article 1269h, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, is in part as follows:

"Section 1. A-That the governing body of any incorporated city in this State may receive through gift or dedication, and is hereby empowered to acquire, by purchase without condemnation or by purchase through condemnation proceedings, and thereafter maintain and operate as an airport, or lease, or sell, to the Federal Government, tracts of land either within or without the corporate limits of such city and within the county in which such city is situated, and the Commissioners' Court of any county may likewise acquire, maintain and operate for like purpose tracts of land within the limits

*3

Hon. R. W. Calvert, page 3, 0-6878 of the county.

"S * *

"D- In addition to the power herein granted, the Commissioners' Court of the several counties of this State are hereby authorized to lease any airport that may be acquired by the county, as herein provided, to any incorporated city or municipality within such county, or to the Federal Government, for the purpose of maintaining and operating an airport; and provided further that any incorporated city having acquired land for an airport, or an airport, under the authority of this Act, shall have the right to lease said land or said airport to the county in which said incorporated city of located. "S * * "Sec. 3. Any airport acquired under and by virtue of the terms of this Act shall be under the management and control of the governing body of the city or the Commissioners' Court of the county acquiring the same, which is hereby expressly authorized and empowered to improve, maintain and conduct the same as an airport, and for that purpose to make and provide therein all necessary or fit improvements and facilities and to fix such reasonable charges for the use thereof as such governing body or Commissioners' Court shall deem fit, and to make rules and regulations governing the use thereof. All proceeds from such charges shall be devoted exclusively to the maintenance, upkeep, improvement and operation of such airport and the facilities, structures, and improvements therein. . ." (underscoring ours)

In answer to your first question we refer you to our Opinion No. 0-3865, a copy of which is herewith enclosed, wherein it states: "It is our opinion that the Commissioners' Court has no authority to lease an airport to any party except those set out in paragraph D of Section 1, Article 1269h." Thus, the Commissioners' Court can only lease an airport to "any incorporated city or municipality within such county or the Federal Government." It is, therefore, the opinion of this department that the Commissioners' Court cannot lease a county owned airport to an individual.

The Commissioners' Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and has only such powers as are expressly provided for by the Constitution and laws of this State or reasonably implied therefrom. Von Rosenberg v. Lovett, 173 S. W. 508, 511, writ refused; Foster v. City of Waco, 113 Tex.

*4 352, 355, 255 S. W. 1104; Roper v. Hall, 280 S. W. 289, 291. The Commis sioners' Court has the implied authority to do the things reasonable necessary to discharge the express duties or powers conferred upon it. City National Bank v. Presidio County (Civ. App.), 26 S. W. 775, Roper v. Hall, supra, Von Rosenberg v. Lovett, supra, 11 Tex. Jur. 566. In the case of Von Rosenberg v. Lovett, the court after stating the foregoing rules said on page 514: "It would be a vain thing to impose upon anyone a duty, and deny him the means whereby he could perform such duty."

It will be noted that the Commissioners' Court is given the express power and authority by Article 1269h, supra, "to acquire, maintain and operate" an airport. It is common knowledge that a manager of an airport is necessary to the maintenance and operation of an airport. It is, therefore, the opinion of this department that Article 1269h, supra, confers upon the Commissioners' Court the implied authority to appoint a manager for the county owned airport. It is within the sound discretion of the Commisioners' Court to determine the amount of compensation of the manager for his services, and whether such compensation shall be a salary or a commission.

We wish to point out, however, that Section 3 of Article 1269h, supra, states that all proceeds from charges derived from the operation of the airport shall be "devoted exclusively to the maintenance, upkeep, improvement and operation of such airport." This in effect makes all money derived from the operation of the airport county money subject to a limited use.

Article 1709, V. A. C. S., provides that "the county treasurer shall receive all monies belonging to the county from whatever source they may be derived, and pay and apply the same as required by law, in such manner as the Commisioners' Court of his county may require and direct."

It is, therefore, the opinion of this department that before any money may be paid the manager of the airport Article 1709, as well as the budget law (Article 689a-11), must be complied with.

We hereby express our appreciation for your discussion on the questions submitted.

Very truly yours, ATTORNEI GENERAL OF TRIAS

By J. C. Davis, Jr.

Assistant

By

John Reeves

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1945
Docket Number: O-6878
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.