History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-7374
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1946
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 THEATTORNEYGENERAL

OFI‘EXAS AUSTIN 1~. TEXAS

GROVER SELLERS -N

AlTORNEYGENERAI.

Honorable W. D. Laceg

County Attorney

Leon County,Centerville, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion No.

Re: Authority of the Coizimlssloners’ Court of Leon County to pay the county clerk charges for recording veteran’s dis- and for furnishing certified copies of the same.

We have received your letter on the above subject matter. We of recent date requesting an opinion from this department

quote from your request the following:

“Art. 1939a of the Revised Statutes of Texas requires certain county officers to furnish to any person, his guardian, or his dependents or heirs at law who is eligible to make a claim, etc.-- shall etc. wlthout cost furnish a certified upon request, ena authenticated copy or copies of any instrument public record or aocument, etc. on file or in custody of such officer.

“Under the above Statute the County Clerk of this furnish county f.s called upon to furnish and does to the persona mentioned in the above Sta-

tute s great many Certlfled Copies of Veterans discharges, Marrlage License ana Birth Certificates, end also records a great many veteran’s discharges wlthout cost tothe veterans, their guardians, de- pendenta ana heirs at law.

“This county la operattng under ‘the fee system and the above aervioea rendered the veterans by the County Clerk has become quite a burden to the oounty clerk who informa me the work requires one deputy to attend to it.

The Commissioners’ Court has refused to pay the county clerk for performing the above work In connection with for furnishing the Certified copies and recording the Veteran’s discharges.

Honorable W. D, Lacey, page 2

"I will thank your Department for a ruling as to whether the County la legally liable to the said Clerk for recording the veteran's discharges and for furnishing the above mentioned certified copies; if 80, would the Commissioners' Court be authorized to pay the Clerk the usual fees for so recording the discharges and furnishing the certified copies above mentioned."

Article 1939a, V.A.C.S., aa amended by the Acts of the Forty-ninth Leglalature, 1945, Chapter 346, Page 587, Section 1, is as follows:

"Article 1. Any person, his guardian, or his dependents or heirs at law who is eligible to make a claim against the Government of the United States of America as a result of service in the Armed Forces of the United States of America, or the services auxiliary thereto, including the Maritime Service and the Merchant Marine, shall upon the re- quest therefor by such person, his guardIan, or his dependents, or heirs at law, be furnished without cost a certified and authenticated copy or copies of any instrument, public record OP document necea- aary to prove or establish such claim, which is in the custody OP on file In the office of county clerks, district clerks and other public officials of this State, by such officials. Provided, the issuance of such certified or authenticated copy or copies by such officials shall not be considered in determining the msxltrmm fee of such offices.

"AP,~ 0 2 0 The rights conferred by this Act shall extend to any person, his guardian OP his dependents, or heirs-at-law who are eligible by reason of service heretofore or hereafter rendered in the Armed Forces of the~united States of America, or the services Auxiliary thereto, including the Maritime Service and the Merchant Marine, when such person, his guardian, or his dependents, or heirs-at-law are eligible to make claim against the Government of the United States of America as a result of such service."

This department held in Opinion No, O-6939 that the county clerks and districtclerks were required to furnish to ex-servicemen without coat a certified and authenticated copy or copies of any instrument necessary to prove a claim against the United States Government.

Honorable W. D. Laceg, page 3 o-7374

In construing Article 1939 (as amended by the Acts of the 48th Legislature) we held in our opinion No..o-6750 that the Commissioners' Court had no authority to allow any fees claimed by the county clerk for recording and keeping discharges of the members of the Armed Forces or Reserves.

The Commissioners' Court is a court of llmtted juris- diction and has only such powers as are conferred expressly or by necessary implicstion by the Constitution or statutes of this State. (Galveston, Houston and San Antonio Ry. Co. v. Uvalde County, 167 S.W. (2d) 305, error refused).

To entitle an officer to receive fees or commissions the receipt thereof umat have been provided for and the amount fixed b law. (See 34 Texas Jurisprudence 522 and cases cited therein Y.

We have been unable to find any statute authorizing the Commissioners' Court to pay the county clerk a fee or com- mission for recording veteran's discharges and for furnishing certified copies of the same. Neither have we been able to find a fee provided for this service. Therefore, it is the opinion of this department that your question should be answered in the negative and It is so answered.

Very truly yours, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By s/ J.C. Davis, Jr. J.C. Davis, Jr, Assistant By s/ John Reeves John Reeves JR/=/WC

APPROVED SEP 12, 1946

s/Grover Sellers

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Approved Opinion Committee By a/BwB Chairman

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1946
Docket Number: O-7374
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.