Case Information
*1 GENERAL TTORNEY F-XAS AURT~N~~.TEXAS ‘. ,..~
PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEY GENERAL Beer 8S.r:
,Your rquost rer an opiniea eenre~ln# the alova aub- j *et h8a liem reeolrea. ,l)rem yeur lo~,o*, * ~uatot
: :
.
Hono Arthur B, Kniokerbocker, page 2
werding plaoed thereon ao preoeribed herein, and whoeter alriTe8 any autesobilo, truek or other motor Tehiels belenging to the State upoli the streoto or say towm or oity or upon ublio highway without ouoh inooriptieo a pr nted thereen shall bo tiaad mot leoi x thoa Iwenty-fire Dollara ( 5.00) aor aore thoa One Hundred Dollars ( O0,Q@)6* (A&r 1921, p. 122, as amendad Acts 1931, 42nd Leg., pa 373, oh, 219, 81,)
In construing thlo Artiole, we are guided by the termo of Article 7 of Vern@nsu Aaretated Pemol Uode, wh3oh previdoo:
“This o ode a?d l fery other law upen the subject of orlme which may be onaeted o&all be eolutrued aoeordlag te thr lc~fn Ipp rt of the language in which it is wr ttaa, w #hut f r regard to the disbioobiaa uoaolly made between the oonotruction of psnal lauo and laws upso ether subjoeto; and ue person shall be p&Wohed for 831 orirnse whish lo net made pnal by the plain
import or the weraa of a 1aw.w There oan bo a@ (IWtian that the torma of Article 821, aupra, are ao plainly port werdo could bo. There seem0 to bo 1~) mistake ia tk interrtion set forth in t&&s the rfginol Aot as poooed by Zk Ar\r)lolee Going Back to
u Lo&* 1921, Chap, 59 of the Goneral Law@, we find SW- m hr stating:
Vhe f&at that State-owned metor Tekiales ore not BOW deaignatadB ereatu sonfwiu, and is an impadimnt to th* peace officers enforting the traffio laws or this Statoo D 4” Ears we have the rpeaifio intent sf the Legi8lature stated0 It $o for the buofit of poe@e oftieers while they are oo- rollww &Lo trarffie laws of this Blah. It kelped thee of- iierm &a iaentlry readily atate-@ned meter vohieleo, and not o&y t&at, it made more feasible the approhonoioa of lrzd enp1oyoe.a wing Stabs-awzM vehiclu slakl. alelelo The Me4 Le&datu# ef 1931 Qhrp. ter ~a* p8rmouo 229, w MO 373 sf the Gmnora% Lawa amen&Y No brifeb SO bile t300ia that YI, &moerbptlen and morktags on the Wt be om -a etiQf o@On aad Q&diingUishtis effeot, the Ti ~upbaoized tk* provisions or this Article 4prl ~alwairo *3 Hon. Arthur B. Knirkerbocker, PWQ 3
ati reoogpizs~ the importanea of it stated by the 37th The ArtMe, as the 42~3 Legislature arzendrd ?wrr*t-* _ _ _ W8rptioru or eretiptlen lagraftid
pPkebS4n air *0mtmmtki, ie conoeiv&le that emcrgeaaies mi.*Jt arise in whiah the &$jutant Gene-2 could oporats to bebtep advanta(o br ling -arked vehiol*F,- But
Eon. Arthur B, IFaiakorboakar, paga 4
required by Artialr 821, supra. On the other hand, the Adjutant Gemral may re6eire liaemse plates for State- owed ~ehie3m wiCheu& identifying mrkings normally provided fer State-owned notor equipment, provided the State Highway Department deems it adriaable,
1. There ir no authsrity for the Adjutant
General to operate State-owned vehicles thr identitiration mark* ana without rig8 required by &ticlo 821, TaA,P6Ca 2. Under the authority f tha State HLgh-
way Dopartruat the Adjutant General may ba irsurP iicansa plates without the idri&tlfying markings normally pro- vide& r0r State-owned motor a ulprnont, if that Doprtme~t Umna the ssuanoe or rlub plates adtinbloa C&75&-3u, .‘. .;. “, T'aA.Q .li. ,: APPRQVXT) OPIXION CORXlITTEE APPROVED m 10. 1967 B
