Case Information
*1 TEE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OD? TEXAS AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711
JOHN L. E11.r. OENEZRAL
A’I’TOENECY August 13, 1973 Honorable Alton R. Griffin Opinion No. H- 83 District Attorney
Lubbock County Courthouse Re: Effect of Senate Bill Lubbock, Texas 79401 123, 63rd Leg., upon
the jurisdiction of the Texas Youth Council Dear Mr. Griffin: over 18 year olds
Your letter asks:
“The question arises as to whether or not the Texas Youth Council loses its present power to order reconfinement of a child after the child has attained his eighteenth (18) birthday. A further question will also arise as to whether or not the Texas Youth Council would have to order the re- lease of any person reconfined prior to September 1, 1973, if that person is eighteen (18) years or
older. ‘I Generally the Texas Youth Council is governed by the provisions of Article 5l43d, V. T. C. S. The Act provides in its $ 31: “Every child com- mittedto the Youth Council as a delinquent, if not already discharged, shall be discharged from custody of the Youth Council when he reaches his twenty- first bir,thday. ”
Senate Bill 111, Title 3 of the Family Code, V. T. C. S., effective Sept- ember 1, 1973, provides in 8 54.04 for a hearing to determine the disposition to be made of each case after the adjudication hearing. The alternatives available to the court cover a wide range and include commission>or commit- ment to the Texas Youth Council. Section 54.05(b) ,of Title 3 provides: “All dispositions automatically terminate when the child reaches his eighteenth birthday. ‘I
The Honorable Alton R. Griffin, page 2 (H-83)
It is therefore our opinion, in answer to your questions, that upon the effective date of Senate Bill 111 the Youth Council will lose its power to order reconfinement of a child after the child has attained his eighteenth birthday. Further, we are of the opinion that any child presently in the custody of the Youth Council who will have attained his eighteenth birthday on or before A.ugust 27, .1973, should be released upon the effective date of Senate Bill ,123.
Senate Bill 123, which becomes effective August 27, 1973, reads (in part) :
“Set tion 1. The purpose of this Act is to extend and obligations of majority all the rights, privileges, It to all persons who are at least 18 years of age. shall be construed liberally to accomplish that purpose, “Sec. 2. Notwithstanding any statutory or deci- sional law, or any rule, regulation, :or ordinance of this state or of any political subdivision or% incorporated city or town of this state, a person who is at least 18 years of age has all the rights, privileges, and obligations of a person who is 21 years of age. A. law, rule, regula- tion, or ordinance which extends a right, privilege, or obligation to a person on the basis of a minimum age of 21, 20, or 19 years shall be interpreted as prescribing a minimum age of 18 years. ”
The right to be released upon the attainment of 21 years of age would appear to be a right based upon a minimum age (reaching a majority) and, thus, under Senate Bill l23, will be available to person aged 18 after August 27, 1973. See Attorney General Opinion H-82 (1973).
SUMMARY Upon the effective date (September 1, 1973) of Senate Bill 111, 63rd Leg. , R. S. (Title 3 of the Family Code), the Texas Youth Council will lose its power to *3 The Honorable Alton R. Griffin, page 3 (H-83)
order reconfinement of a child after the child has reached his eighteenth birthday. Any child confined with the Youth Council who will have attained his eighteenth birthday on or before August 27, 1973, should be released on that date - - the date upon which Senate Bill 123, 63rd Leg., R. S., emanci- pates persons 18 years old from disabilities of legal infancy.
Very truly yours, Attorney General of Texas APP%V D: IY
DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman
Opinion Committee
