*1 The Attorney General of Texas

September 28, 1979

MARK WHITE

Attorney General

Honorable Felipe Reyna Opinion No. Mw-6 0 Criminal District Attorney

McLennan County Re: Use of county funds to Waco, Texas 76710 operate a zoo.

Dear Mr. Reyna:

You have requested our opinion regarding the use of county funds to operate a zoo. Article 6061t provides:

Section 1. In this Act, ‘governmental unit’ means a city, town, independent school district, ‘or any other political subdivision.

Secticn 2. Any other governmental unit may by agreement establish, provide, maintain, construct, and operate jointly with another governmental unit located in the same or adjacent counties, playgrounds, recreation centers, athletic fields, swimming pools, and other park and recreational facilities located on property now owned op subsequently acquired by either of the governmental units.

See also V.T.C.S. art. 608lf (county authorized to acquire and improve -You ask whether McLennan County may contribute funds for the operation and maintenance of, and capital improvements to, the Central Texas Zoo, which is located on property owned entirely by the City of Waco. The animals exhibited at ,the zoo are owned by the Central Texas Zoological Society, a nonprofit corporation.

In Attorney General Opinion H-413 (1974), thii office held that, pursuant to article 6081t, a county is authorized to contribute to the construction of a swimming pool by an independent school district on land owned by the district, so long as the agreement serves a proper public purpose, results in an adequate benefit to both parties, and provides for joint participation. See Ten. Const. art. RI, S 52. In our opinion, a similar rationale is applicable to the operation of the Central Texas Zoo. The P. 189

Honorable Pelipe Reyna - Page Two (NI+6 6 )

agreement between McLennan County and the City of Waco should be drawn so as to indicate clearly that a public purpose is being served and that both the city and the county will derive a benefit from its execution. In addition, the sgreement should assure that the zoo is under the joint control of the parties See also Attorney General Opinion H-93 (1973).

Although the zoo is operated by a nonprofit corporation, which also owns the exhibited animals, we do not believe that the proposed arrangement will thereby be rendered invalid. The present agreement between the Society and the City of Waco provides that the Society shall have no power to “bind the City by . . . any contract . . . or to impose any liability upon the City without [its] prior written consent.” In Attorney General Opinion H-R23 fl978), this office held that a county was authorized to contract with a rape crisis center for the performance of services which the county might itself have performed. Likewise, since McLennan County and the City of Waco are authorized by article 6081t jointly to operate a zoo, we believe that they may jointly contract with the Central Texas Zoological Society to operate the facility.

SUMMARY A county is authorized by article 6081t, V.T.C.S., to contribute funds for the maintenance and operations of a zoo located on property owned entirely by a city.

~~

Attorney General of Texas JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.

First Assistant Attorney General

TED L. .HARTLEY

Executive Assistant Attorney General

Prepared by Rick Gilpin

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITl’EE

C. Robert Heath, Chairman

David B. Brooks

Walter Davis

Susan Garrison

Rick Gilpin

William G Reid

Bruce Youngblood

P- 190