Case Information
*1 The Attorney General of Texas July 25, 1983
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General opinion NO.JM-47
John W. Holcombe. DVM Executive Director
Texas Animal Health Commission Re: Authority of the Texas P. 0. Box 12966 Animal Ilealth Commission to Austin, Texas 7x711 use Form 2-71 pertaining to inspections of livestock moving interstate Dear Dr. Holcombe:
You ask the following questions: 1. May the Texas Animal Health Commission provide inspections for livestock moving from Texas to another state?
2. May the commission use Form 2-71 for this purpose even though it is not mentioned in the statutes governing the commission?
806 Broadway. Suite 312 We answer both of your questions in the affirmative. Lubbock. TX, 79401.3479 8061747-5238 Chapter 161 of the Agriculture Code creates and sets forth the duties and powers of the Texas Animal Health Commission. The 4309 i-4 Tenth. suite e commission is required to protect all ljvestock from various diseases McAllen. TX. 78501~1685 under section 161.041 of the Agriculture Code and is empowered, inter 5121682-4547 alia. to promulgate rules necessary for the enforcement of its duties. Code §161.046. Section 161.048 of the code specifically AgriC. permits "aI1 agent" of the commission to stop and inspect any shipment 200 MaIll Plaza. Suite 400 San A,ltOnlO. TX 78205.2797 of livestock being transported in this state. The section sets forth 5,21225~4191 the following:
(a) An agent of the commission is entitled to stop and inspect a shipment of livestock or livestock products being transported in [.his state in order to:
(1) determine if the shipment is in compliance with the laws and rules administered by the commission affecting the shipment; (2) determine if the shipment originated from a quarantined area or herd; or *2 Dr. John W. Holcombe - Page 2 (JM-47)
(3) determine if the shipment presents a danger to the public health or livestock industry through insect infestation or through a communicable or noncommunicable disease.
(b) The commission x detain a shipment of livestock or livestock products that is being transported in violation of law or a rule of the commission. The commission x require that the shipment be unloaded at the nearest available loading facility.
(c) The commission may not inspect a railroad train at any point other than a terminal.
(d) The commission may post signs on public highways and use signaling devices, including red lights, in conjunction with signs, if necessary to effectively signal and stop vehicles for inspection.
(a) In this section, 'livestock product' includes hides; bones; hoofs; horns; viscera; parts of animal bodies; litter, straw, or hay used for bedding; and any other substance capable of carrying insects or a disease that may endanger the li~vestock industry. (Emphasis added).
See also Agric. Code §§161.041, 161.043, 161.044, 161.047.
There is no necessity for construction when a statute is expressed in unambiguous language and its meaning Is clear and obvious. Trimmier v. Carlton, 264 S.W. 253, 263 (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin 1924, writ granted). See aho. Gilmore v. Waples, 188 S.W. 1037, 1038 (Tex. 1916); Railroad Commission of Texas v. Miller, 434 S.W.Zd 670, 672 (Tex. 1968); National Life Insurance Company v. S_te_ga 11) 169 S.W.:d 155, 157 (Tex. 1943). The word " may It ordinarily connotes discretion or permission, District Grand Lodge No. 25 G.U.0, of O.F. v. Jones, 160 S.W.2d 915, 922 (Tex. 1942), and it will not be treated as a word of command unless there is somethine in the context or subject matter of the act to indicate that it was used in that San Angelo National Bank v. Fitzpatrick, 30 S.W. 1053, 1054 Se*Se. (Tex. 1895). Accordingly, we construe section 161.048, Agriculture Code, to repose in the Texas Animal Health Commission discretion to stop and inspect any shipment of livestock for the reasons set forth in the statute. The commissioner's discretion to inspect is in contrast to the mandatory inspection procedure established in 50 designated counties by section 146.051 et seq. of the Agriculture Code, which creates a county office of inspector of hides and animals. *3 Dr. John W. Holcombe - Page 3 (JM-47)
Your second question asks whether a form adopted by the commissioner, Form 2-71, may be used for the purpose of conducting livestock inspections even though it is not mentioned in the Statutes governing the commission. We conclude that it may. You have informed us that Some States will accept this certification in lieu of an official health certificate issued by a veterinarian. We cSn find no statute, nor have you directed "8 to one, which requires veterinarian certification for inspections. Section 161.048 permits "an agent" of the commission to conduct inspections; there is no requirement that inspections be conducted by veterinarians. The form, which you included for our examination, need be signed only by an "inspector," and there is no requirement that he be a veterinarian. Thus, we conclude that the form which you submitted to us may be used by the commission for purposes of conducting inspections pursuant to section 161.048 of the Agriculture Code.
SUMMARY (1) The Texas Animal Health COrnmiSSiOn may, St its discretion, conduct inspections of livestock moving from Texas to another state; it is not required to do so. (2) The Texas Animal Health Commission may employ Form 2-71 for the purpose of conducting such inspections. ruly you
Vet-y k/ s k JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas TOM GREEN
First Assistant Attorney General
DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Jim Moellinger
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OP~lNION COMMITTEE
Rick Gilpin, Acting Chairman
Jon Bible
David Brooks
Colin Carl
Jim Hoellinger
George Warner