Case Information
*1 The Attorney General of Texas February 23, 1984 JIM MAlTOX
Attorney General Mr. Harrison Stafford Opinion No. JM-130
Supreme Court Bullding President P. 0. BOX 12548 Austin, TX. 78711. 2549 Lavaca-Navidad River Authority Re: Meaning of "commission" 5121475-2501 P. 0. Box 429 for purposes of permit issued Telex 9101874-1367 Edna, Texas 77957 to the Lavaca-Navidad River Telecopier 512/4750266 Authority 714 Jackson, Suite 700 Dear Mr. Stafford: Dallas. TX. 75202-4506 214/742-8944
You have asked our opinion as to whether the 1977 reorganization
of the Texas Department of Water Resources has changed the duties and responsibilities of the Texas Water Commission in such e manner that 4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 El Paso, TX. 79905.2793 the term "commission" as used in Lavaca-Navidad River Authority's 9151533.3464 Permit No. 2776 should now refer to the executive director of the Department of Water Resources, the Texas Water Commission, or both. P The language in question is contained in a condition to Permit No. ,Ol Texas. Suite 700 2776 which states: Houston, TX. 77002-3111 71312255S86
This permit is issued subject to all superior and senior water rights in the Lavaca River Basin and, 604 Broadway, Suite 312 as may be determined by the Commission, to the Lubbock. TX. 79401-2479 release of water for the maintenance of the 8001747-5238 Lavaca-Matagorda Bay and Estuary system. (Emphasis added). 4309 N. Tenth, Suite B McAllen, TX. 78501~1SS5 In your request, you state that equating the term "commission" in 5121682-4547 Permit No. 2776 with the Texas Water Commission creates both practical and legal difficulties. You recognize that the Texas Water Commission
200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 [hereinafter coarmission] presently has the judicial authority to San Antonio, TX. 78205-2797 impose a release requirement upon the permit holder but question 512/225-4191 whether the commission has the expertise and support staff to
independently investigate the problem, review available information, and recommend a solution. Further, you question whether the An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer commission has the jurisdiction to undertake such a determination.
In 1977, the legislature consolidated the Texas Water Rights Commission with the Texas Water Quality Board and the Texas Water Development Board. The legislature separated the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of the consolidated agency, Texas Department of Water Resources. Water Code §15.011-5.016. The Texas Water Development Board and the commission are agencies of the state *2 Mr. Harrison Stafford - Page 2 (.X+130)
and have legislative and judicial functions, respectively. Water Code §§5.091 and 5.221. The executive director manages the administrative affairs and exercises the executive function of the department. Water Code $5.171.
After reviewing the Water Code provisions both before and after the reorganization, we conclude that the term "commission" as used in Permit No. 2776 means the Texas Water Commission. First, the determination of whether the authority has to make releases of water impounded in the reservoir authorized by Permit No. 2776 for maintenance of the Lavaca-Matagorda Bay and Estuary System is a judicial determination, in that the legal rights, duties, or privileges of the authority and others are affected by such a determination. Before an agency can take such action, affected parties must be afforded an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the Texas Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act. V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a. 513. Clearly, the executive director could not conduct such a hearing, since the executive director exercises the executive functions of the department. Water Code 05.171.
Secondly, the present Water Code vests in the commission ample authority to make such a determination. All of the provisions giving the commission the authority to impose a release requirement upon the permit holder give the commission the authority to determine when the requirement or condition should be exercised.
Before the reorganization, the general powers and duties of the Texas Water Rights Commission were found in sections 6.051-6.076 of the old Texas Water Code. Presently, the general powers and duties are found in sections 5.261-5.268 of the Texas Water Code. Other specific powers and duties are prescribed in other sections of the code. The authority of the commission to determine water releases under the permit condition is found in its general powers and duties and in sections 11.147, 12.014, 16.012(b)(5), 16.012(d), 16.013, and 16.058.
Section 11.147 requires the commission to assess the effects of the issuance of a permit to store, take, or divert water on the bays and estuaries of Texas. The authority to consider this question and to impose release requirements in a permit gives the commission the implicit authority to determine at this time the release required by such a permit condition.
The lack of expertise about which the authority is concerned would be applicable to the permit consideration as well as the present determination of the release requirement. The legislature, however, has provided that the department and the executive director's staff provide the connnission assistance in considering effects on bays and estuaries. Section 12.014 provides that the commission shall use the *3 Mr. Harrison Stafford - Page 3 (~~-130)
surveys, studies, and investigations conducted by the staff of the department in carrying out the commission's duties and functions. Section 16.012(d) requires the executive director to assist the commission in carrying out the purposes and policies stated in section 12.014. Further, section 16.013 requires the executive director to advise and assist the commissio" with regard to engineering, hydrologic, and geologic matters concerning the water resources of the state.
Section 16.012(b)(S) states that the executive director shall "investigate the effects of fresh water inflows upon the bays and estuaries of Texas" under his general authority to make studies and surveys. Section 16.058 specifically requires the executive director to carry out a comprehensive study of the effects of fresh water inflows upon the bays and estuaries. While the executive director has the authority to make studies concerning bays and estuaries, there is no authority for the executive director to determine the legal rights and duties under a permit. This is a function given to the commissio".
I" co"cl"sio", the 1977 reorganization has not stripped the Texas Water Commission of the authority to determine what release of water, if any, is necessary for the maintenance of the Lavaca-Matagorda Bay and Estuary System. The reorganization, however, has given the executive director the authority and duty to make studies and to assist the commission in carrying out its duties and functions. The permit in question specifically states that it is issued subject to the commission's right of continual supervision. There is no provision in the present Water Code that would require the commission to wait for the executive director to i~nitiate a proceeding to determine what release of water is necessary under Permit No. 2776. The commission has acted within its authority and jurisdiction in initiating the proceeding upon its own motion.
SUMMARY The 1977 reorganization has not stripped the Texas Water Commissio" of the authority to determine what release of water, if any, is necessary for the maintenance of the Lavaca-Matagorda Bay and Estuary System.
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas *4 Mr. Harrison Stafford - Page 4 (m-130)
TOM GREEN
First Assistant Attorney General
DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Lambeth Townsend
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Rick Gilpin, Chairman
Jon Bible
Colin Carl
Susan Garrison
Jim Matthews
Jim Moellinger
Nancy Sutton
-,