History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
JM-143
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1984
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 The Attorney General of Texas April 11, 1984

JIM MATTOX

Attorney General

Supreme P. 0. Box 12546 Austin. [51214752501] Telex Telecopier 9101874-1367 TX. 76711.2546 Court Building [51214750266] Austin, Texas 78711 Chairman Monorable Carl A. Parker P. 0. Box 12068, Capitol Station Senate Education Committee may establish a "cafeteria plan" Re: Whether a community college Opinion No. JM-143 of employee benefits in accor- dance with Internal Revenue Code section 125. 714 Jackson, Suite 700 Dallas. TX. 76202.4506 Dear Senator Parker: 2141742-6944

You have asked whether a community college has authority under 4624 Alberta El Paso, TX. 79905.2793 9151533.3464 Ave., Suite [160] article 3.50-3 of the Insurance Code, section 130.084 of the Education Code, or other law to set up a "cafeteria plan" of employee benefits in accordance with section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code [hereinafter I.R.C.]. r

lW1 Texas, Suite 700 Section 125 of the I.R.C. provides in part: Houston, TX. 77002-3111 7131223-5666

(a) In general. -- . . . [N]o amount shall be included in the gross income of a participant in a 606 Broadway, Suite 312 cafeteria plan solely because, under the plan, the Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 participant may choose among the benefits of the 6061747-5236 plan.

4309 N. Tenth. Suite S . . . McAllen, TX. 78501-1665 512,682-4547 (d) Cafeteria plan defined. -- For purposes of this section --

200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX. 76205.2797 (1) In general. -- The term 'cafeteria plan' 5121225-4191 means a written plan under which -- An Equal Opportunity/ (N all participants are employees, and Affirmative Action Employer

(B) the participants may choose among two or more benefits.

The benefits which may be chosen may be nontaxable benefits, or cash, property, or other taxable benefits.

Honorable Carl A. Parker - Page 2 (JM-143)

A cafeteria plan is an employee benefit plan under which an employee may choose between taxable compensation and one or more tax exempt fringe benefits, such as accident and health insurance, financed by the employer's contribution. [1984] 2 Stand. Fed. Tax w (CCH) li 1197T.01; S. Rep. No. 1263, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 6, reprinted in 1978 U.S. Code Cong. (L Ad. News 6761, 6771. 6838. Although the cafeteria plan effectively permits the employee to convert taxable cash compensation into nontaxable fringe benefits, section 125 of the code maintains the tax exempt status of those fringe benefits. Nontaxable employee benefits paid for by the employer include group term life insurance up to $50,000, I.R.C. 579, disability benefits, I.R.C. 5105(d), accident and health plans, I.R.C. 5106, group legal services plans, I.R.C. 5120, and dependent care assistance payments, I.R.C. $129. See S. Rep. No. 1263, supra, at 6838. Taxable benefits include group%rm life insurance in excess of $50,000 as well as cash, property, or other tangible compensation. Id. at 6837. -

The essential feature of a cafeteria plan is that the employee may choose between taxable and nontaxable benefits provided at the employer's expense. A cafeteria plan is more flexible than a plan under which the employer pays only for specific benefits and does not allow his employees to choose among alternative benefits financed by him. See, e.g., Attorney General Opinion H-859 (1976).

With this background in mind, we will consider whether a community college may establish a cafeteria plan for its employees. Community colleges are subject to Insurance Code article 3.50-3. See Ins. Code art. 3.50-3, 153(a)(4), (8); 4(b)(4)(D), (E), (F); Attorney General Opinion NW-215 (1980). A stated purpose of article 3.50-3 is

to provide uniformity in the basic group life, accident, and health insurance coverages for all employees of Texas colleges and universities.

Art. 3.50-3, 02(s). Moreover, community colleges must comply with basic coverage standards developed by the administrative council. & §4@)(4)(A), CD). Once the college provides a basic coverage plan that complies with article 3.50-3, it may be able to add enough optional elements to establish a cafeteria plan.

Section 11 of arti.cle 3.50-3 provides that no eligible employee may be denied any of the coverages provided by this act unless he waives them in writing. Each full tine employee is entitled to automatic protection under a basic plan of insurance unless he waives basic coverage or chooses optional coverage. Id. 511. The premium for basic coverage must be fully paid for by the employer. Id. Thus, article 3.50-3 itself requires community colleges to provide one nontaxable benefit -- basic accident, life and health coverage funded *3 nonorable Carl A. Parker - Page 3 (JM-143)

at the employer's expense. See 19 T.A.C. 525.33 (Basic Coverage Standards).

Sectfon 4(b)(4)(F) provides in part:

All contracts for basic coverages negotiated from the effective date of this Act shall be in compl~isnce with basic coverage standards . . . . Each governing board may provide such additional or optional insurance programs and coverages as it deems desirable for its employees. (Emphasis added).

A cormnunity college may be able to construct a cafeteria plan by using its power to provide additional or optional coverages. For example, it could provide, at its expense, optional life insurance coverage in an amount in excess of $50,000, a taxable fringe benefit. See I.R.C. $%79, 125. It may also be able to provide at its expense other nontaxable fringe benefits in the form of health and accident insurance. See I.R.C. 0106. Article 3.50-2, section 5(a) and article 3.51 of theInsurance Code authorize a community college to provide another nontaxable employee fringe benefit, disability insurance, paid for in whole by employer contributions. See I.R.C. 5105(d).

The Administrative Council established by Insurance Code article 3.50-3 has issued the following regulation: "Provisions shall be made for the payroll deduction for premiums of the optional coverage." 19 T.A.C. 825.34(c). In our opinion, this regulation does not require that the employee pay premiums for optional coverage. It merely requires that the college arrange for payroll deduction of premiums for which the employee is responsible. See also Ins. Code art. 3.51 (express authority for public employer to pay entire premium for employees' health, accident. and disability insurance).

We believe articles 3.50-3 and 3.51 of the Insurance Code authorize community colleges to establish a "cafeteria plan" consisting of a choice of fringe benefjts in the area of life, accident and health. and dissbility insurance. Though the range of benefits is narrow, section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code only requires that the participants be able to choose among "two or more benefits." You have not j~nquired whether a junjor college may provide such nontaxable benefits ss group legal services or dependent care assistance payments. We therefore do not address this question, except to say that a community college may not grant these employee benefits unless it has express or implied statutory authority to do SO.

Any cafeteria plan established by a community college must comply with all appl~icable requirements of section 125 of the Internal

Donorable Carl A. Parker - Page 4 (JM-143) Revenue Code to realize the benefits of that provision. You have not presented a specific plan for our consideration and we express no view ss to how a community college might implement a plan, or the validity of =v such plan under federal law. If a community college establishes a cafeteria plan and it wishes to know whether participants in the plan qualify for the favorable tax treatment accorded by section 125 of the code, it should seek a Revenue Ruling from the Internal Revenue Service.

SUMMARY A community college may set up a "cafeteria plan" for its employees consisting of a selection of taxable and nontaxable fringe benefits in the area of life, accident and health, and disability insurance.

Very/truly yod JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas TOM GREEN

First Assistant Attorney General

DAVID R. RICEARDS

Executive Assistant Attorney General

Prepared by Susan L. Garrison

Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

Rick Gilpin, Chairman

Jon Bible

David Brooks

Susan Garrison

Jim Moellinger

Nancy Sutton

Bruce Youngblood

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1984
Docket Number: JM-143
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.