History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
JM-366
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1985
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 The Attorney General of Texas October 22. 1985 JIM MAlTOX

Attorney General Mr. Charles D. Trmia Opinion No. JM-366

S~ppme Own Bullding Executive Director P. 0. Box 12548 Texas Parks and W!.l.dlife Re: Whether the Parks and Wildlife Austin. TX. ?8711- 2540 5121475-2501 Department Columisslon may delegate certain Telex 9101874.1367 4200 Smith School Road permitting authority to the execu- Telecopier 51214754266 Austin. Texas 711?44 tive director of the department 714 .hckson. Suite 7M) Dear Mr. Travis: Dallas, TX. 75202-r506

2lU742.8944

You ask us tixther the Parks and Wildlife Conmisslon [hereinafter

the "Comission"] is authorized, through its rulemaking powers, to delegate to the Ih:ecutive Director the authority to issue permits in 4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 compliance with chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code. See Parks El Paso. TX. 799052793 915/- & Wild. Code 586.001 et seq. You qlso Inform us that the C~ission

has already delegated this permitting authority to the Executive Director through rules promulgated more than ten years ago. See 31 lo0I TBXPS. Suite 7W Houston, TX. 77002~3111 713l223ea6 Section 86.002(a) of the Parks and Wildlife Cod2 provides: 808 Broadway. Suite 312 (a) No person may disturb or take marl, sand, Lubbock, TX. 7B401-3419 gravel, shell, or mudshell under the management 8081747-5238 and protection the eomission or operate in or 4309 N. Tenth, Suite B McAllen. TX. 78501~1685 [51218824547] purpoac: other than that necessary or incidental to navlgat:ion or dredging under state or federal bed or fishing water for any disturt any oyster authorj.ty without first having acquired from the

commisc~Joa a permit authorizing the activity.

200 Mdn Plaza. Suite 409 (Empha~~is added). San Antonio. TX. 792052797

[51212254191] Section 86.004 provides: The mmmisslon may grant a permit to an appli-

A” Equal DOpo~unWl Alllrmtive Action Employer cant &I has complied with all requiramancs of the zsoion if the commission finds the dis- turbinlc,, taking, and carrying away of marl, sand. gravel, shell, or mudshell will not: (I) damage or injurlously affect any isl.md, reef, bar, channel, river. creek, or bays used for navigation, or any oysters, p, 1677

Mr. Charles D. Travis - Page 2 (JM-366)

oyster beds, or fish in or near the water used in the oper#.tion; and
(2) cbar.g,a or injuriously affect any current t'aat would affect navigation. (Emphasis atided).

Moreover, any person desj.ring a permit must make a written application to the Conmission. See I'arks & Wild. Code 186.003. If the Commission refuses to grant a=Lt to an applicant. the body is required to make written findings of facts explaining the reason for the refusal. See Parks h Wild. Code IE6.008; see also V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a, 5515, ma) . Therefore, the legislature has explicitly designated to the Comrtssion the pemittinl; authority under chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code.

Through its rulemak~iag authority, the Commission has delegated its authority to issue permlts to the executive director. See 31 T.A.C. The agemy roles provide in part:

(a) The f&.owiag procedures will be followed for the issuance of general permits: (1) All requests for shell dredging permits will be made, in writing to the director. . . . . (6) The +irector may consider the following criteria in determining vhether to grant or deny a permit. . . . (Emphasis added).

See 31 s57.45. The rules also provide for the director or any Gloyee authorized by 1:be director to hold a hearing to determine vbether a permit will bl! granted. See 31 T.A.C. 1557.45(a)(4)-(8). These rules make no provisions for the Conmission to make a final datermination of wbetber a permit will be granted. Accordingly, they are in conflict with sec,tion 15 of article 6252-13a. V.T.C.S. See Citizens Bank of Bryan 7'. First State Bank, Eearne. 580 S.W.2d 344. 347 (Tex. 1979); see t?iso V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a. 422 (lam in --- conflict vith the Adminl~~trative Procedure and Texas Register Act are

repealed). We also conclude that the rules In question are in direct conflict with the legis:.ative mandate that the Commission grant or deny permit applications. Despite the fact these rules bave been In effect and have

been followed by the agency for ten years, they are contrary to the plain meaning of the applicable statutes; and therefore, afford no basis for the continuation this agency practice. See Brown -- Express, Inc. v, Railroad~Comission, 415 S.U.2d 394 (Tex. 1967).

Mr. Charles D. Travis - Page 3 (JM-366)

We do not imply that the Commiaaion is totally precluded from promulgating rules delegatir,g, its authority to hold hearings on permit applications. The legislatwe has not prohibited the Coamissio~ from delegating this function. See Attorney General Opinion JM-244 (1984). me- But the Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act requires that the granting of an agency 'permit must comply with the provision6 of the act concerning contested cases. See V.T.C.S. art. 6252-13a.

113(3), 18(a). Although section 15 ofrhe act clearly allovs the appointment of a hearing examiner in such cases, see Grace v. Structural Pest Control Boa::d of Texas, 620 S.W.2d 157 (K Civ. App.

- Waco 1981, vrit ref'd n.r~~ommission mst sake the ultimate decision and include findluns of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with sections 15 and 16. See Citizens Bank of Bryan v.

First State Bank, Hearne, supra. at 347; Texas Health Facilities colmission v. Charter Medical-Dallas, Inc.. 665 S.W.2d 446 (Tex.

1984); Consusars Water, In-. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, 651 S.W.2d 335 (Tex. App. -Austin 1983. no writ).

SUMMARP Section 57.45 of chapter 31 of the Texas Administrative Code is invalid because it is inconsistent with chapter 86 of the Parks and Wildlife Code an'3 article 6252-13a. the Adminis- trative Procedure and Texas Register Act. The Parks and Wildl:.fe Commission is not precluded from delegating :;ts authority to hold hearings on permit applications so long as the practice is in compliance with article 6252-13a.

JIM HATTOX Attorney General of Texas TOM GREN

First Assistant Attorney G'sueral

DAVID R. RICRARDS

Executive Assistant AttoNqg General

ROBERT GRAY

Special Assistant Attorney #General

RICR GILPIN

Chairman, Opinion Committee

Mr. Cherlee D. Travie - Pwgc 4 (JM-366)

Prepared by Tony Cuillory

Assistaut Attonley General

APPRovm:

OPINION CCRQlITTRg

Rick Gilpin. Chelrmm

Colin Carl

Sussn Garrison

Tony Guillory

Jim Mocllinger

Jennifer Riggs

Nancy Sutton

Sarah Woelk

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1985
Docket Number: JM-366
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.