Case Information
*1 ’ The Attorney General of Texas Pcbruary 21. 1986 JIM MAlTOX
Attorney General
Supreme Court Suildlng P. 0. BOX 12S4a A”s*in. TX. 78711. 254S [51214752501] Telex QlO/S74-1387 Telecopier 51214750288 Honorable Hike Drtscoll Harris County Attorney Houston , Texas K'OO2 1001 Preston, Sui:e 634 Opinion No. JM-434 Rc: Whether a county clerk is entitled administration of trust funds under to receive a fee in connection with article 2558a. section 4c(a), V.T.C.S. 714 Jackson, Suite 700 Dallas, TX. 75202-4SC6 [21417426844]
Dear Mr. Driscoll: You have reqxsted our opinion in regard to the implementation of
section k(a) of a:cticle 2558a. V.T.C.S. Specifically you have asked: 4S24 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 1. .4t what point in a lawsuit would the fee be El Paso, TX. 799052793 9151533-3454 assessed and collected? 2. 'Does commissioners court, the county clerk
1Wl Texas, Suite 7M) or the judge in each case institute collection of Houston, TX. 77002-3111 the fee? 713i2255888 3. !fay the county clerk receive a reasonable SO5 Broadway, Suite 312 fee for, holding the trust funds pursuant to the Lubbock, TX. 79401-3479 decision of the Texas Supreme Court in Sellers v. SOW7476238 Harris Cfounty, 483 S.W.2d 242 (Tex. 1972)? 4308 N. Tenth, Suite B 4. Is the county clerk entitled to a reason- McAllsn. TX. 78501-1885 able fe'e for holding trust funds in probate 51ZSS2.4547 matters?
200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX. 782052797 [51212254191] Section 4c(a) provides: To o,ffset the expense of handling District
Clerk aad County Clerk Trust Funds for the benefit of 1it:lgsnts in civil proceedings, a county v.ay An Equal OpportUnitYI collect from the nonprevailing party in the Affirmative Action Employer
litigation or from the party the court shall designate a fee of $50.
V.T.C.S. art. 25.5lla, §4c(e). The Texas Supreme Court in Sellers v. Aarris County, 403 S.W.2d 242 (Tex. 1972) described article 255ga as: p, 1985 *2 Honorable Mike Driscoll - lltrge 2 (JN-434) - -
a comprehensive statute setting procedure and liability in thq! handling of trust funds in the possession of county and district clerks. It makes the county liable if funds on deposit with its designated depository are lost. The clerk Is reliwed of responsibility for the safekeeping of the funds so lcng as they are deposited In the legally selected ldepository.
483 S.W.2d at 243.
Prior to Sellers, su~ca, Barris County relied on section 4a to collect all interest earned on the trust fund and place this interest in the general fund of the county as an offset to the expense of handling the trust fund for the benefit of the litigants. But. the supreme court in Sellers, i=, held that interest earned by deposit of money owned by the parties to a lawsuit is the property of the ovners and not the county. 483 S.W.2d at 243. Accordingly, we beliave from the expres:l words of section 4c(a) the legislature intended to allow the cou~:y to collect only a $50 fee to offset the expense of handling the trust fund.
You first ask. at 4x;lt point in the lawsuit would the fee be. assessed and collected. The provision does not specify a particular time in which the fee may be collected. The Supreme Court of Texas has promulgated rules re!.atcd to cost in civil cases. See Tex. R. civ. P. at 125-49; see d.80 Gov't. Code 022.004. Theseles are --- applicable to all civil cues instituted in the state courts.
Rule 129 outlines the procedure for collecting cost. Rule 129 provides in part:
If any -L responsible for costs fails or refuses to pay the same within ten days after demsnd for payment, the clerk or justice of the peace may make c:c:rtified copy of the bill of costs thm due, and place the same in the hands of the sheriff or conr:t:able for collection. All taxes imposed on law proceedings shall be included in the bill of costs. Such certified bill of costs shall have the force and effect of an execution. The r-al of a case by appeal shall not prevent the issuance of an execution for costs. (Emphasis added).
Tsx. R. Civ. P. 129. Th:ls rule contemplates that the cost is to be collected from the responsible party when it is due. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the function for which the cost is taxed has been performed. Cf. Attorney General Opinion H-756 (1975) (clerk may not collect a feefor service of process before service is made).
P. 1986 *3 Ronorsble Mike Driscoll - Page 3 (JM-434)
Moreover, Rule 125 provii.es that parties responsible are only liable for costs "incurred" CL!, when the funds have been tendered to the county clerk to be held k1 trust.
Section 4c(a) authorizes the county to collect the $50 fee from either the nonprevailing party or from the party the court shall designate. V.T.C.S. srt. 2558a, 04-z(a). Accordingly, before a district or county clerk may collect the $50 fee. the expense of handling the trust fund must have been incurred. The assessment of cost will necessarily await the outcome of the litigation. Cf. hhitley v. King, 581 S.W.2d 541 (Tex. Civ. App. - Fort Worth 1979,T writ).
In regard to your swond question, it is not clear under section 4c(a) who is required to institute collection of the fee. Section 4c(a) only provides that "a county" may collect the fee. V.T.C.S. art. 2558a. S4c(a). A:.though counties normally act through the commissioners court, artlcle 2558s contemplates that the county and district clerks shall render the service of handling the trust fund. See generally Sellers v. Harris County, 483 S.W.2d 242 (Tex. 1972). Thus, we believe that th; county clerk is required to institute the collection of the $50 fw under article 3930(10), V.T.C.S. Article 3930 provides in part:
County cler'w . . . are hereby authorized and required to collect the folloming fees for services rendered by them to all persons, firms, corpora- tions, legal entities, governmental agencies and/or governmental representatives: . . . .
(IO) For such other duties prescribed, autho- rized, and/or permitted by the Legislature for which no fee f.s set by this Act, reasonable fees shall be chargt:d. (Emphasis added).
V.T.C.S. art. 3930(10). Accordingly, we conclude that the county clerk is responsible in each case for instituting the collection of the fixed fee of $50 aut'borized by section 4c(a). Poreover, Rule 129 of the Texas Rules of Cdvil Procedure, as quoted above. also Implies that county or district clerks institute the collection of costs due. Cf. Tax. R. Civ. P. 129. -
You next ask whether the county clerk may receive a reasonable fee pursuant to Sellers 'i. Harris County, 483 S.W.2d 242 (Tex. 1972), for holding the trust funId. We think not. Sellers, s, held that the county may charge a fee which is reasonably related to the value of the county's services. Id. at 244. However, section 4c(a) specifies that the fee for handling the tNSt funds is to be $50.
Honorable Mike Driscoll - :?age 4 (Jkf-434)
Thus, the legislature has determined that this fee Is reasonably related to the value of 1;h.e services; and, therefore. no sdditioual fee may be assessed.
Finally, you ask whether a county clerk is entitled to collect a reasonable fee for holding trust funds in probate matters. Section 12(s) of the Probate Code p,rovides:
The provisfcns of law regulating cost in ordinary civil cases shall apply to all matters in probate when noExpressly provided for in this Code. (Emphasis added).
Section 4c(a) of article 2558a. V.T.C.S., applies to all "civil proceedings," and we are unaware of any express provision In the Probate Code relating to t,he expense of handling district clerk and county clerk trust funds for the benefit of the litigants. Therefore, section 4c(a) is applicable to probate proceedings. For the reasons specified above, the county or district clerk is entitled only to a fixed fee of $50 for handling the trust fund in probste matters.
SUMMARY Before a district or county clerk may collect a $50 fee pursuant to section 4c(a) of article 2558a. V.T.C.S., the expense of the district or county clerk for handling the trust fund must have been incurred, and there must have been a designa- tion of a responsible party by the court. Article 3930(10), V.T.C.!;., requires the county clerk to institute this zollection of the fixed fee of $50 authorized by section 4c(a). Section 4c(a) of article 2558a. V.T.C.S., requires that the county receive a reasonable fee of $50. No other fee is contemplated by the provision. Finally section 4c(a) is read t:ogether with section 12(a) of the Probate Code, the county clerk may collect the $50 fee in probate l>roceedings.
JIM HATTOX Attorney General of Texas JACK HIGHTOWER
First Assistant Attorney General
. Honorable Mike Dtiscoll - P,aSe 5 ml-434)
MARY KELLER
Executive Assistant Attorney General
ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Tony Guillory
Assistant Attorney General