History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
DM-45b
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1991
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 @ffice of tty !&tornep tkiecal Watt of &txae November 27,199l

Honorable Allen Hightower Opinion No. DM- 4SB chalrman

Committee on Corrections Re: Whether the amendment to article Texas House of Representatives 42.18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure P.O. Box 2910 regarding the mandatory time that Austin, Texas 78768-2910 inmates must serve prior to eligibility for

parole is retroactive (RQ-65) Dear Representative Hightower:

You ask a question about certain amendments to section 8(b) of article 42.18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure adopted by the 70th Legislature. Section 5 of House Bill 680 and section 7 of Senate Bill 341 of the 70th Legislature amended section 8(b) to reduce the time that certain.prisoners had to serve before being eligible for parole. H.B. 680, Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 3&t, 3 5, at 1889; S.B. 341, Acts 1987, 70th Leg. ch. 1101, 5 7, at 3754. You ask whether this change applies only to inmates convicted after the effective date of the amendment. We conclude that it does.

House Bill 680 does not limit the effect of its reduction of the time necessary to be served before parole eligibility with respect to the time of the commission of the crime for which the prisoner was sentenced.1 Because its effect is not detrimental to the affected prisoners, application of this change in the law to prisoners convicted of crimes committed before its effective date would run afoul of neither the a post fucfo doctrine nor the restriction against retroactive laws found in article I, section 16, of the Texas Constitution. U.S. Const. art I, 0 9, cl. 3; id. 0 10.

%stion S of House Bii 669 also amended s&on 8(b) by adding seaions 8(b)(2) ~hrougb 8@)(S). The changes made by the addition of these subsections were spccirrcaUy made applicable only to prisoners conkted of olhses committed on or after the cffeaivc date of the aa. Aas 1987, 70th kg., ch. 384, 5 g(a). Howew, seaions 8(b)(2) through s@)(5) were subsequcnlly repealed. Aas 1989.71w Leg.. ch. 785,$5.01 at 3536.

Hooorable Allen Hightower - Page 2 (DH-ISB)

CL 1; Weaver v. GM, U.S. 24 (1981); M~llinger v. Ciry of Houston, 3 S.W. 249 (Rx. 1887); Twtwville v. Gondy, 272 S.W. 559 (Tex. Cii. App.-Fort Worth 1925, no writ). Therefore, considered alone, the change in the time necessary to be served before parole eligibility effected by section 5 of House Bill 680 would apply to prisoners without regard to the time the offense was committed. See also Schmolesky, 77Lne Changes: Growing Complerity in Texas Sentencing Law, 30 S. Tur L REV. 283,299.300 (1989) (ex post facto doctrine).

However, Senate Bill 341 includes section 18(b), which expressly limits the effect of the amendment to section 8(b) by section 7 of that bill to prisoners sentenced for an offense committed on or after the effective date of the act. In construing acts passed at the same legislative session, the courts will read them as one act. Henderson v. State, 758 S.W.2d 694 (Ten App.-Austin 1988, no writ). For a later enacted provision to repeal a provision adopted earlier in the same session, there must be express repeal or an irreconcilable repugnancy between them. Id House Bill 680 was adopted after Senate Bill 341: but neither repeals nor conflicts with the earlier enacted act. In regard to the reduction of the time necessary to be served before parole eligibility, the later enacted act is silent as to its effect on prisoners sentenced for crimes committed before its effective date, and the earlier enacted act has an express provision making the change applicable only to prisoners sentenced for an offense committed after its effective date. Section 18(b) of Senate Bill 341 is the only express indication of the legislature’s intent regarding the effect of the amendments on prisoners with respect to the time an offense was cotmnittcd.3 As we must harmonize the two bills we conclude that the application of the change made by the 79th Legislature reducing the time prisoners must serve before becoming eligible for parole is limited as provided by section 18(b) of Senate Bill 341.

*Senate Bi 341 was fmaUy adopted by the legislature on May 23.1987. House Bii 680 was fmally adopted on May 25.1987.

3Botb SCU.~C Bii 341 and How Bill 630 became &dive OD Sqtembcr 1.1987. *3 Ijonorable hen Hightower - Page 3 (DW45Bl

SUMMARY

The effect of the amendments to article 42.18. section 8(b). of the Code of Criminal Procedure reducing the time prisoners must serve before becoming eligible for parole is limited to prisoners convicted of offenses committed on or after the effective date of the amendments.

DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas WILL PRYOR

First Assistant Attorney General

MARY KELLER

Deputy Assistant .kzomey General

JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY (Ret.)

Special Assistant .ktomey General

RENEA HICKS

Special Assistant .\:tomey General

MADELEINE B. JOHSSON

Chair, Opinion Coxrnittee

Prepared by John S:eine:

Assistant Attorney- General

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1991
Docket Number: DM-45b
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.