History
  • No items yet
midpage
Christopher Mossburg v. State
16-1869
| 4th Cir. | Feb 17, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Maddox Mossburg, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Christopher Maddox Mossburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mossburg v. Maryland, No. 8:15-cv-01633-RWT (D. Md. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Christopher Mossburg v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 17, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1869
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.