History
  • No items yet
midpage
Felix Prescott v. American Automobile Ass'n
676 F. App'x 643
| 9th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*2 Prescott’s employer terminated him from his job as a tow truck driver after a background check he authorized revealed he did not meet the defendants’ requirements to serve their members. [1] Prescott’s employer gave him a pre-adverse employment action notice before terminating him as required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, but he did not receive one from defendants. See 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(b)(3)(A) . Prescott sued, alleging in his Second Amended Complaint that he suffered an injury traceable to the denied opportunity to challenge HireRight’s adjudication and defendants’ background check policy. See Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins , 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547–50 (2016). Because Prescott received all the notice to which he was entitled, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint.

AFFIRMED.

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[1] The parties are familiar with the facts so we do not recount them here except as necessary to explain this disposition. 2

Case Details

Case Name: Felix Prescott v. American Automobile Ass'n
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 14, 2017
Citation: 676 F. App'x 643
Docket Number: 15-55935
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.