History
  • No items yet
midpage
COUNTY OF HERKIMER v. VILLAGE OF HERKIMER
CA 16-00672
| N.Y. App. Div. | Feb 3, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 106

CA 16-00672

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY OF HERKIMER,

PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER VILLAGE OF HERKIMER,

RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LONGSTREET & BERRY, LLP, FAYETTEVILLE (MICHAEL LONGSTREET OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE WEST FIRM, PLLC, ALBANY (THOMAS S. WEST OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Erin P. Gall, J.) entered February 2, 2016 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action. The judgment declared that petitioner-plaintiff County of Herkimer is immune from the zoning restrictions of respondent-defendant Village of Herkimer in this matter.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: COUNTY OF HERKIMER v. VILLAGE OF HERKIMER
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 3, 2017
Docket Number: CA 16-00672
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.