History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Jamaille Midgette
16-7324
| 4th Cir. | Feb 3, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamaille Devon Midgette, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Howard, Augustus D. Willis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Jamaille Devon Midgette appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Midgette’s motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Midgette, No. 4:12-cr-00029-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jamaille Midgette
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 3, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7324
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.