History
  • No items yet
midpage
Patrick Takeuchi v. John McHugh
677 F. App'x 321
| 9th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Takeuchi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his Title VII action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We *2 review de novo. Vinieratos v. U.S. Dep’t of Air Force Through Aldridge , 939 F.2d 762, 767-68 (9th Cir. 1991). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Takeuchi’s Title VII action because Takeuchi failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See id . at 772 (“The law requires an aggrieved federal employee to elect one exclusive administrative remedy and to exhaust whatever remedy he chooses.”).

We do not consider claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v.

Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-17205

[*] Eric Fanning is substituted for his predecessor, John M. McHugh, as Secretary of the Army under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

[**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[***] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Patrick Takeuchi v. John McHugh
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 30, 2017
Citation: 677 F. App'x 321
Docket Number: 15-17205
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.