Upon consideration of Petitioner Stefan Rozembersky’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus, ^[1] Statement of Facts, Statement of Issues and Relief Sought, and Statement of Reasons for Issuing the Writ filed on January 4, 2017:

(1) Petitioner petitions the court to: (a) amend certain supreme rules related to examination and admission to the State bar; (b) allow attorneys, who are admitted and in good standing in another state, take the Hawai ' i bar examination, regardless of law school accreditation;

(c) allow for “waiver by motion” which would *2 allow applicant attorneys admission to the Hawai ' i bar without examination; and

(d) award Petitioner costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees associated with bringing this matter before the court.

(2) A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the Petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief. Straub Clinic & Hospital v. Kochi, 81 Hawai ' i 410, 414, 917 P.2d 1284, 1288 (1996).

(3) Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to the relief requested. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 26, 2017. '

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2

[1] Petitioner did not pay the required filing fee for this petition for a writ of mandamus. See Rule 45(e)(1) and Appendix B of the Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure.