History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cao Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc.
16-1664
| Fed. Cir. | Jan 27, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAO GROUP, INC., Appellant v.

BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2016-1664 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,271.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ H. D ICKSON B URTON , TraskBritt, PC, Salt Lake City,

UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. J EFFREY G UNN , S TEPHEN E. P ULLEY .

J OSHUA L EE R ASKIN , Greenberg Traurig LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee.

______________________ T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , M OORE , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT January 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: Cao Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jan 27, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1664
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.