History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael Munoz v. SunTrust Bank
16-1766
| 4th Cir. | Jan 26, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before AGEE, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Munoz, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew William Krueger-Andes, Robert R. Marcus, SMITH MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Michael Munoz appeals the district court’s order granting SunTrust Bank’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Munoz’s civil action for lack of prudential standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Munoz v. SunTrust Bank, No. 5:15-cv-00119-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Michael Munoz v. SunTrust Bank
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 26, 2017
Docket Number: 16-1766
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.