History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Jones v. Annucci
45 N.Y.S.3d 712
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: January 26, 2017 522306 ________________________________

In the Matter of VERNON A.

JONES,

Appellant,

v

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision,

et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: November 29, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Vernon A. Jones, Fallsburg, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M.

Goldfarb of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Platkin, J.), entered November 27, 2015 in Albany County, which, among other things, dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision withholding petitioner's good time allowance.

Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision to withhold petitioner's good time allowance based upon his failure to complete required programming. Supreme Court, among other things, dismissed the petition. Petitioner now seeks to challenge that dismissal of

-2- 522306 the petition.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Time Allowance Committee and the Commissioner affirmed the Committee's recommendation that petitioner's good time allowance be restored due to petitioner's completion of programs and continued positive disciplinary record. In view of this, petitioner's challenge to the prior determination has been rendered moot and this appeal must therefore be dismissed (see Matter of Gonzalez v Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 107 AD3d 1283, 1283 [2013]). Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the narrow exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Jones v. Annucci
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 26, 2017
Citation: 45 N.Y.S.3d 712
Docket Number: 522306
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.