*1 Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Marcos De Jesus-Zeferino appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the nine-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

De Jesus-Zeferino claims that the district court procedurally erred by failing *2 to address his arguments for a low-end sentence. We disagree. The record reflects that the court considered De Jesus-Zeferino’s arguments and sufficiently explained its reasons for concluding that a mid-range sentence was warranted. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

De Jesus-Zeferino’s unopposed motion to take judicial notice of the presentence report is granted.

AFFIRMED .

2 16-50253

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).