*1 Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Lucio Najera-Corchado appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Najera-Corchado’s counsel has filed a brief *2 stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have considered Najera-Corchado’s October 4, 2016, pro se submission. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 16-10239

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).