History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Catherine Randolph v.
673 F. App'x 334
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order returning her complaint because it was not in compliance with the prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Catherine Randolph v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 19, 2017
Citation: 673 F. App'x 334
Docket Number: 16-2306
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.